<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>FeynStructure wrote</title><author_name>FeynStructure (npub10s…mtu2g)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub10sfqr5vucrdnkkgullhu7j9vmesxjtps2arull53q4nrxmwhh8dsemtu2g</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I will agree that it&#39;s a unit of measurement that has outgrown its usefulness for amounts that matter to the average person.&#xA;&#xA;Furthermore, I will conceed that it&#39;s an arbitrary construction and that sats are what actually appear in the base code. It&#39;s as if we treated Avogadro&#39;s number as the &#34;real&#34; unit and small numbers of atoms as fractions thereof. Kind of ridiculous when you think about it that way.&#xA;&#xA;I do think this will be a hard thing to change though. Cultural inertia and all that. Maybe what ends up changing is just people&#39;s familiarity and comfort with sats as a unit.&#xA;&#xA;I have to ask though, does your excited nephew understand that you haven&#39;t gifted him $8.5 billion equivalent?</html></oembed>