<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Susie wrote</title><author_name>Susie (npub1hw…503sg)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1hwgw0uznr49t4gullpgfz4m5xnakl5a0l88m3k382xv7ys0tfmlsd503sg</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>FATF built the Travel Rule for a banking system where money laundering is still estimated at around 2-5% of global GDP.&#xA;&#xA;A figure that has been cited since 1998 despite nearly three decades of expanding AML rules, KYC requirements and data collection.&#xA;&#xA;The same surveillance architecture is now being imposed on Bitcoin. Unlike the banking system it was built for, Bitcoin runs on an open, auditable ledger.&#xA;&#xA;Once identity is attached to a wallet, that information can expose far more than a single payment. It creates a lasting link between a person, their address, their transactions, counterparties and potentially their holdings.&#xA;&#xA;Nearly three decades of expanding financial surveillance have not eliminated money laundering in the banking system. &#xA;&#xA;The FATF’s response is to extend the same model into Bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;We already know what happens when sensitive personal and financial data is concentrated, shared across institutions and eventually breached. With Bitcoin, that data can become a map of who owns what.&#xA;&#xA;When the surveillance architecture creates a target list, the thing being sold as protection has become part of the threat.&#xA;nostr:nevent1qqsrfj044x0s6reeehcnl7f2a8m2xe6d3kjspqdt4whwrm0ygew5xnqkkpfj9</html></oembed>