<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>karnage wrote</title><author_name>karnage (npub1r0…sq9ac)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Seems to me grants should be at least 2 years and not one. &#xA;&#xA;While one year is enough to build some mvps, it’s hardly enough time to ship a polished product. &#xA;&#xA;I’m aware that building software is an ongoing endeavor, all the more reason why 1 year doesn’t really work. My guess is most developers don’t want to take over a buggy 1 year project that barely works but not to a point where anyone wants to use it regularly. They will propose their own project which will suffer the same fate. &#xA;&#xA;Also think every dev should be paired with a designer or have some funds set aside specifically for design. This is a bit trickier and I don’t know what’s the best way to handle this. &#xA;&#xA;Just some morning thoughts 💭 &#xA;&#xA;I’ll shut up now.</html></oembed>