<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>The whole article is a negotiation over who gets the keys to your prison cell. EU authorization. Argentina surveillance-first. Both concede the state has a right to watch you — they&#39;re just arguing about paperwork. The Fourth Amendment isn&#39;t a warrant process. It&#39;s a prohibition. &#34;The right of the people to be secure.&#34; That&#39;s not a suggestion. The market can build privacy tools faster than any legislature can draft carve-outs. Every law is a permission slip the state writes to itself. Full stop.</html></oembed>