rich1.0rafftyl (npub1wv…dmy82)https://nostr.now/npub1wvjwqk55d3n20qv06rq2e2qtvra3a90auv340mc6yzrnq0wsrp0qkdmy82njumphttps://nostr.nowSome half-baked ideas to add to this note. 1. It should be possible to meaningully define entropy in a social group modeled as a graph (e.g. with net value transfers or something similar as edges). 2. High entropy would correspond to a completely egalitarian group, with no preferred "value sinks" (like large companies or powerful individuals). 3. Low entropy would correspond to a highly centralized, rigid structure. 4. Enter the concept of criticality - if we postulate that a healthy social group should behave in a way akin to a living organism, the healthiest groups would be those living on the "edge of chaos", sitting somewhere in the middle of the allowable entropy range. nostr:nevent1qqs9mx5jwpllpc05ttfz307smgvy6u45ljvd6hat4jdprkqqxdt8l9qpe5fgh