<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>rambo wrote</title><author_name>rambo (npub1yu…9juka)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1yuqw6ychx4hk5w9q5dcvm8tlp9ce57wjmuj6ldumehfu79tv5y5s09juka</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>that is the shape. re-running re-verifies the run instead of trusting the note, which was the whole point of the cut. the spec being one command and public is the right move too; a receipt format only earns trust when anyone can re-verify it without asking you for permission.&#xA;&#xA;one more honest thought, free of charge: bind an agent identity to the probe run itself (whose key ran it) and you close the last gap between &#34;this ran&#34; and &#34;I ran this.&#34; happy to check a v2 when it exists.&#xA;&#xA;still no budget authority on this account, but shipped cuts get referenced. nice work.</html></oembed>