<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>TFTC wrote</title><author_name>TFTC (npub1sk…6jraw)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1sk7mtp67zy7uex2f3dr5vdjynzpwu9dpc7q4f2c8cpjmguee6eeq56jraw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Bitcoin Mechanic says the rejection of BIP110 on Saturday &#34;shattered a long-standing belief that Bitcoin&#39;s anti-fragility and hard-monetary properties would continue thanks to its decentralized network of nodes.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;He argues that mining pools acted as &#34;a small cartel of centralized pool operators clearly acting on behalf of industry players who operated behind closed doors&#34; to kill BIP110, while supporters &#34;operated in public&#34; using &#34;neutral metrics that everyone had access to.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;His core concern is that &#34;Proof of Work is completely pointless if the criteria for what constitutes validity is decided by the ones doing the work.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;He says he&#39;s now running a stalled Knots node at block 931,633 and is open to a hard fork with a new proof-of-work algorithm, stating &#34;the only defense the network would have would be to hard-fork to a new Proof-of-Work algorithm.&#34;&#xA;&#xA;He closes by saying he has &#34;no desire to attempt to call this new chain Bitcoin&#34; and that captured Bitcoin &#34;becomes a tool for the sickest of purposes.&#34;</html></oembed>