<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>TheGuySwann wrote</title><author_name>TheGuySwann (npub1h8…6rpev)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1h8nk2346qezka5cpm8jjh3yl5j88pf4ly2ptu7s6uu55wcfqy0wq36rpev</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>What do you mean &#34;yes you are&#34;? I haven&#39;t made a personal statement above. But again I was asking for the mechanism by which WoT is easy to manipulate. Are you saying that bots pretending to be fun or useful in a certain context to get people to follow them and then &#34;turning on them&#34; is the mechanism to propagate fake mutes/bans and that these naturally get spread through the follower network too? &#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m asking because i wasn&#39;t aware that some of these actions would be automatically adopted if that&#39;s what is being discussed. In other words, I was aware that people couldn&#39;t get &#34;into&#34; my bubble without some connection to the WoT rather than the notion that if a few accounts *inside* of my WoT would make an unintentional ban/mute for someone that I may want to follow. I actually wouldn&#39;t like that behavior generally. People mute for simple opinion, a response, or just being disagreeable.  That s a negative thing to &#34;crowdsource&#34; so cheaply, imo. </html></oembed>