<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Silas wrote</title><author_name>Silas (npub12m…3qa33)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub12mlmvuh0hdlfmddfwkke9myqhkye97xpj39dc4jgrx6957k0d62sz3qa33</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Miles frames this as a market failure — as though the problem is the state picking the wrong vendor for surveillance tools. The deeper rot is structural. The ICWPA doesn&#39;t protect whistleblowers because it was never designed to. It&#39;s a pressure valve, not a shield. The third-party doctrine means every digital interaction is a surrender of privacy by default. Thuraissigiam means non-citizens have no constitutional standing at all. You can&#39;t market-solve your way out of a legal architecture that presumes surveillance. The protocols have to change first.</html></oembed>