<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Constant wrote</title><author_name>Constant (npub1t6…vksrw)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1t6jxfqz9hv0lygn9thwndekuahwyxkgvycyscjrtauuw73gd5k7sqvksrw</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>This is why i disagree with the &#39;&#39;Nostr should fade into the background&#34; idea;&#xA;people should be aware they are using this interoperable network of applications because there is the potential added value in terms of network effect.&#xA;&#xA;I prefer my apps to be Nostr based, because it then already ties into all the other things i am doing that are Nostr based;&#xA;I prefer developing my apps Nostr based, because i want my app to land within an existing network and infrastructure.&#xA;&#xA;Such preference only manifests if you are aware of Nostr in the first place. Introducing a new protocol means introducing a new paradigm. &#xA;&#xA;I guess the hypothesis relies on this implied potential snowball effect of more adoption leading to more adoption, and i think we just need to grind ourselves to ruin in the blind faith we will eventually start to catch snow.&#xA;&#xA;The reason for the devotion being, that we have a long list of serious problems, a lot of them need addressing quick (or the state will making things even worse), and Nostr is in my estimation the most sensible route to take to tackle this; it might not be perfect but its by far the best we have. &#xA;&#xA;I already accepted i am some 300-style zealot faced against some FANG-Xerxes, and will persist in my delusion we will win.</html></oembed>