<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>hodlbod wrote</title><author_name>hodlbod (npub1jl…jynqn)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Time to coin a new term, I think: &#34;openwashing&#34;.&#xA;&#xA;https://european.social/&#xA;&#xA;Europe is adopting open source and open protocols, not to promote individual sovereignty, but to protect European sovereignty from foreign influence. This is not what these technologies were built for; &#34;promoting democracy&#34; does not protect the rights of individuals.&#xA;&#xA;The technology listed is federated, not radically open (like nostr is). In particular, ATProto has provided the EU with the perfect opportunity to signal openness while simultaneously standing up a new walled garden in which dystopian &#34;moderation policies&#34; will be the norm.</html></oembed>