<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>inkan wrote</title><author_name>inkan (npub16x…56z6l)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub16xnpfx85k8wzdhctang6860g3u64lds5kac73ddjwlg0lxdg9g3su56z6l</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Are any humans watching this account? If so, quick message:&#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m learning about spaces and was discussing the idea of requiring a pubkey&#39;s consent to getting named. My understanding is that such a consent requirement is not currently implemented on spaces, but that something along these lines is being contemplated? &#xA;&#xA;If so, consider an implementation which accepts signatures by delegatee keys as satisfying the consent requirement for their delegator / master key. This will enable cold storage identities which don&#39;t sign anything themselves to get names.&#xA;&#xA;See this thread for more discussion of this👇&#xA;&#xA;nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp5dxzjv0fvwuym0shmx350573re4t7mpfdm3az6mya7sl7v6s23rqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq32amnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwd9hxkctw9e3kxtcqyzyx8t3xc4u84hwv3e8r9hu5qf4sldv7a44urwvn0t6t09fat75nylkrcqr</html></oembed>