<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>daniel wrote</title><author_name>daniel (npub1ae…q4nwx)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1aeh2zw4elewy5682lxc6xnlqzjnxksq303gwu2npfaxd49vmde6qcq4nwx</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>In a recent talk, nostr:npub1s33sw6y2p8kpz2t8avz5feu2n6yvfr6swykrnm2frletd7spnt5qew252p makes the case correctly that we should stop using the term “custodial,” as this is the language that helps the legacy system define self-custody or their term “unhosted” to suggest that owing your own property is somehow not normal or acceptable.&#xA;&#xA;He goes on to say that we should simply call anything where we don’t hold our own keys an account, the same as a bank. But what should we call a “wallet” (also an inaccurate word) where we directly own the asset? I still haven’t found the best way to say it.</html></oembed>