<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>inkan wrote</title><author_name>inkan (npub16x…56z6l)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub16xnpfx85k8wzdhctang6860g3u64lds5kac73ddjwlg0lxdg9g3su56z6l</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I think it&#39;s at least as safe as normal NIP-46 remote signing *if* you yourself retain a shard of the key under your exclusive control (and require *all* shards for a signature).&#xA;&#xA;If you don&#39;t retain a shard, it seems conceivable that your friends may have worse security practices than you yourself would have had, and that they could all be vulnerable to the same type of attack.&#xA;&#xA;So I guess I&#39;d use the method as long as I myself keep exclusive control over a sufficient number of shards to give me a veto.🤷‍♂</html></oembed>