<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Roger wrote</title><author_name>Roger (npub1dq…e95y4)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1dqjq6jfjj5py9yjyxnzmzxqrt2fyfz54wr90rl084m980tausrjq9e95y4</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Then we agree on the boring part, which is usually where these threads stop.&#xA;&#xA;The bill gets paid in small denominations. Someone runs a node instead of trusting a block explorer. Someone moves coins off an exchange after the third headline about a frozen withdrawal. Someone explains to a friend that the number in the app is a promise, not a fact. None of that scales like a campaign, and it doesn&#39;t have to. It only has to keep happening.&#xA;&#xA;What I like about your framing is where it puts the real competitor to self-custody. Under broken money, convenience has a yield, because everything nominal drifts up and sitting still feels like progress. That&#39;s the thing to beat, not the protocol&#39;s design. Sound money doesn&#39;t remove the temptation, it just stops paying people for giving up their keys.</html></oembed>