rich1.0t® |g∆ |hç/√\ (npub1ll…uveh7)https://nostr.now/npub1ll2l4chxxc6p725va4adxcpt8jszrkn4xya750htq68r0zln65hs9uveh7njumphttps://nostr.nowHonest and provocative questions. 1) Why should they cut the tree they are living on? 2) Why do we have to assume they ALWAYS have a plan for everything? 3) And, more importantly, if so, self custody wouldn't have been taken into account as a minor nuisance to cope with in the master plan / grand scheme of things? Really, why todays' Saylor's / BlackRocks' / Andy Back's suitcoin would be a resistance tool and not part of their solution? If they are so powerful and allmighty do do we really think that self custody of a captured / increasingly centralized / non-widespread-MoE asset can make any difference against this Leviathan? Today Bitcoin's salvific belief sounds much to me like 'you can vote them out this time' meme.