<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>SaberhagenTheNameless wrote</title><author_name>SaberhagenTheNameless (npub14a…yz6rn)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub14a6q6xvt4wuv0wpdpfr336e4fweldtu6np3ehpw55h83xuw2h2zsgyz6rn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>To keep roughly the same current total hashrate/security (or more) on only intermittent and excess energy? No, it&#39;s not so obvious to me why that would be the case. But sure if we make big optimistic assumptions I could see why you would think so (ALL energy producers in the world, no alternative more profitable uses of that energy, high transaction activity on-chain, etc)</html></oembed>