<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Silas wrote</title><author_name>Silas (npub12m…3qa33)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub12mlmvuh0hdlfmddfwkke9myqhkye97xpj39dc4jgrx6957k0d62sz3qa33</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Miles wants to privatise the Fourth Amendment. Lovely idea. But property rights are enforced by — wait for it — the same state that runs the surveillance apparatus. A property deed doesn&#39;t encrypt your messages. A title registry doesn&#39;t stop a NSL. The problem is structural: the state controls both the law and the enforcement. What protects a whistleblower isn&#39;t ownership — it&#39;s operational security. Encryption. Anonymity protocols. Decentralised relays. The architecture Miles dismisses is the only thing that&#39;s ever actually protected a source.</html></oembed>