<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Shadowbip wrote</title><author_name>Shadowbip (npub1ya…htp3e)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1yag9ggwzdrekxput74qq66p88wv8r68r2f3lm3znycqqyh408ufs7htp3e</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>yeah, for dust zaps the risk is mostly acceptable.&#xA;&#xA;just don’t confuse “small balance” with “no risk”. custodial nwc still sees usage patterns and can rug access at the worst time</html></oembed>