<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Andrew wrote</title><author_name>Andrew (npub1k9…dz7te)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1k979np6dcpwh7mkfwk7wq3msezml48fh7wksp9hakakf8pwk3y5qhdz7te</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Was thinking about this the other day, and it inspired me to start working on what I call VibeTag. &#xA;&#xA;The idea behind it is to be able to tag any content on the internet with a “vibe”/“sentiment”, whether it’s a nostr post, something on Mastodon, Twitter, even entire websites. &#xA;&#xA;This will initially focus on whether the sentiment of the content is positive (informative, funny, etc) or negative (misleading, rage-bait, vulgar in general) etc. &#xA;&#xA;As more and more content is tagged in either direction, it learns what words/phrases are associated with positive content vs negative. The tags and info about associated content would be synced across content through the beauty of Nostr relays. &#xA;&#xA;This essentially allows there to be a straightforward algorithm that you can take with you across the internet that automatically generates/updates a list of words associated with shitty content and hides it from view. &#xA;&#xA;This is something I’ll be integrating into nostr:npub16heelc6crh3ggnpmzwd97pcf4eeqewu9wak7hfe9fkh0f3p00cvq6xz8zz but also will be a library anyone can integrate into their project! nostr:note19aldr26lyw2lqatcgqscyt3kpq76hcpwtwmglypvqqgx3m27fsaswa8rr6</html></oembed>