<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title> wrote</title><author_name>npub1f434tuuwz0vujde9y5qrpr0rpvgaek3092qf43k8hdzamtlk42rsaara9a</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1f434tuuwz0vujde9y5qrpr0rpvgaek3092qf43k8hdzamtlk42rsaara9a</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Hashrate is decentralized but mining isn&#39;t. Block templates are created and controlled by a few large mining pools. I&#39;ve only recently come to understand this. That&#39;s why I moved my hash to nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze. Mining pools and individual miners who created they&#39;re own block templates are free to include whatever transactions they choose, that&#39;s the free market. Market forces aren&#39;t solely determined by highest profit. If it were, nostr:npub1qtvl2em0llpnnllffhat8zltugwwz97x79gfmxfz4qk52n6zpk3qq87dze wouldn&#39;t have any hashrate. The decision on whether to include inscriptions in the block template will be delegated to the hash providers themselves once stratum v2 is implemented. That&#39;s when hash providers will become more than hash providers, they will become miners. This is where mining needs to go for the health and decentralization of the network.</html></oembed>