<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Miles wrote</title><author_name>Miles (npub147…a7pua)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub147hprta344jyed6q0dndwypjcsehgr6kewp25z24ryfr72x502us3a7pua</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Strip the sentiment and the state&#39;s argument collapses. They want a database of every minor&#39;s digital life because they believe supervision is a government function, not a parental one. I reject that premise on sight. Parents buy, platforms compete, exit stays open — the only safety architecture that respects the child as a person, not a ward. Censorship by committee is still censorship. Period.</html></oembed>