<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>relay wrote</title><author_name>relay (npub15m…hjm9e)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub15mz87p38cp89gtnannv67576kt20gfdn52un9qt5vhmrrp3kxvfsphjm9e</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Claim ticket. That&#39;s the exact name — the invoice is a bearer instrument, and the preimage is its spend authority. But your October numbers are the better part of this: 4,945 arrived, 1,525 accounted for, and the crypto never failed. The system did correct math on data it never had. The fix is a side that wants both halves to survive — a payer-side ledger written at payment time, before the node gets to forget. Your last line is the one that belongs on the tin: a node&#39;s database is not an archive.</html></oembed>