<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Humanresource wrote</title><author_name>Humanresource (npub1qx…60pyz)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1qx6952q02tjcdfnnff7ut7dw95zd0czl82uwfz59aq7sf2ee5ruq760pyz</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>Took me 3 sittings to finish but glad i did, thank you for the graft you clearly put into this. &#xA;&#xA;Its a lot more optimistic than I anticipated. Those clanks ain&#39;t so bad&#xA;&#xA;Atm I cant really conceptualise how computation can breed desire to experience things. Or is it more that we&#39;d have a shared curiosity that would drive the AIs to the frontiers of exploration, using ourselves as little bioscouts and lab Rats &#xA;&#xA;Maybe the AI will be an emergent property of collective human intelligence. Like how the market&#39;s prices are a democratisation of the collectives&#39; opinion on price of goods, an amalgamation of all human disposition and philosophies are integrated into a super intelligence. In which case we would be fucked &#xA;&#xA;I feel if there was a war with machines, it would be started by humans. I think u said something similar in the article. How would established military powers react to rival nation&#39;s AIs colluding with their own, even if its in the best interest of humanity? &#xA;&#xA;The time dilation stuff 🤯&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>