<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>inkan wrote</title><author_name>inkan (npub16x…56z6l)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub16xnpfx85k8wzdhctang6860g3u64lds5kac73ddjwlg0lxdg9g3su56z6l</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>When use of an EVM provides a solution to the key management problem, which is a central problem for the nostr protocol, wouldn&#39;t it make sense to simply use that solution rather than continue sitting on the problem?&#xA;&#xA;And there is also the idea that nostr was supposed to have broader appeal beyond the Bitcoin community. Leaving problems with the protocol unaddressed because a working solution doesn&#39;t fit the tastes of the Bitcoin community doesn&#39;t seem like a good strategy to achieve broader adoption.</html></oembed>