<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Jackk wrote</title><author_name>Jackk (npub183…faslh)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub18384z4sjgdfy7vr76thzwtru7jncysz0hcapwesxqsak44p8aemsyfaslh</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>I don’t think it’s irrational to state that for classical (binary) physics to exist, there cannot logically be a double spend at ANY unit of Planck time from Genesis to present.&#xA;&#xA;If you have another solution to the double spend problem other than a quantized block of time, then the world needs to hear it. Please make Bitcoin work without the block.&#xA;&#xA;Quantum theory has a fiat problem of energy/information/time baked in to its core assumptions. Big Physics has not computed a quantum/block to even understand what the measurement boundary must be and why the double spend problem must be resolved in logic/information. How can you even reason about what a pre-measured (quantum) state means without the measurement?&#xA;&#xA;If Bitcoin isn’t your answer, you’re wrong. Bitcoin is the proof, your flawed understanding of Bitcoin is not my responsibility to right.&#xA;&#xA;Again, please tell me why Bitcoin is not physics.</html></oembed>