<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>s3x_JAY wrote</title><author_name>s3x_JAY (npub1ve…738wt)</author_name><author_url>https://nostr.now/npub1veeqt66jt2j209y9nv4a90w3dej074lavqygq5q0c57dharkgw0qk738wt</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://nostr.now</provider_url><html>#[2]​ does proxying? I know #[3]​ does it. I’m not sure what I think about it. Snort does crazy compression to the point that my pics look like crap. If Iris is doing it, then it’s great - things are nice and crisp. (Need to look at the URLs when I’m not on a phone). &#xA;&#xA;The screenshot is why I think Iris doesn’t do it. &#xA;&#xA;Would be nice to offer to #[4]​ users. But I’ll probably have to run a client on my domain to make that happen. Would be nice if the clients let you pick the proxy service. &#xA;&#xA;That said, I do worry about the legal implications of being a proxy. It’s possible things like CSAM are (briefly) on your server. BUT clearly with proxy there’s no intent to break the law.  </html></oembed>