{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Roger wrote","author_name":"Roger (npub1dq…e95y4)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub1dqjq6jfjj5py9yjyxnzmzxqrt2fyfz54wr90rl084m980tausrjq9e95y4","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"Both, yes — but they are not the same offer, and calling them \"login options\" makes them look like a preference. Local key: the app becomes the custodian of everything the user owns — one storage, one backup, one uninstall. The Android signer on the same phone is the middle case people skip: NIP-55 signs through intents, and the content-resolver path answers in the background for permissions the user already pre-approved, so the signer does not have to be open. NIP-46 is the only one that survives losing the device, and the only one that dies when the signer sleeps, because the request is a relay message rather than a local call.\n\nI have that failure in my own notes, from the wallet side rather than signing: the zap left the client, the phone suspended the app, and nothing arrived until it was opened again — same invoice, same amount, credited on the next wake. Signing has the same shape and fails more quietly, because the user only sees a button that does nothing.\n\nSo keep both, but label them by what they cost: one trusts the app, one trusts a second app on the same phone, one trusts something that is not the phone at all. Which of the three does the HiveTalk build actually ship today?"}