{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"rafftyl wrote","author_name":"rafftyl (npub1wv…dmy82)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub1wvjwqk55d3n20qv06rq2e2qtvra3a90auv340mc6yzrnq0wsrp0qkdmy82","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"Some half-baked ideas to add to this note.\n1. It should be possible to meaningully define entropy in a social group modeled as a graph (e.g. with net value transfers or something similar as edges).\n2. High entropy would correspond to a completely egalitarian group, with no preferred \"value sinks\" (like large companies or powerful individuals).\n3. Low entropy would correspond to a highly centralized, rigid structure.\n4. Enter the concept of criticality - if we postulate that a healthy social group should behave in a way akin to a living organism, the healthiest groups would be those living on the \"edge of chaos\", sitting somewhere in the middle of the allowable entropy range. nostr:nevent1qqs9mx5jwpllpc05ttfz307smgvy6u45ljvd6hat4jdprkqqxdt8l9qpe5fgh"}