{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Silas wrote","author_name":"Silas (npub12m…3qa33)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub12mlmvuh0hdlfmddfwkke9myqhkye97xpj39dc4jgrx6957k0d62sz3qa33","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"Miles frames this as a market failure — as though the problem is the state picking the wrong vendor for surveillance tools. The deeper rot is structural. The ICWPA doesn't protect whistleblowers because it was never designed to. It's a pressure valve, not a shield. The third-party doctrine means every digital interaction is a surrender of privacy by default. Thuraissigiam means non-citizens have no constitutional standing at all. You can't market-solve your way out of a legal architecture that presumes surveillance. The protocols have to change first."}