{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Constant wrote","author_name":"Constant (npub1t6…vksrw)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub1t6jxfqz9hv0lygn9thwndekuahwyxkgvycyscjrtauuw73gd5k7sqvksrw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"This is why i disagree with the ''Nostr should fade into the background\" idea;\npeople should be aware they are using this interoperable network of applications because there is the potential added value in terms of network effect.\n\nI prefer my apps to be Nostr based, because it then already ties into all the other things i am doing that are Nostr based;\nI prefer developing my apps Nostr based, because i want my app to land within an existing network and infrastructure.\n\nSuch preference only manifests if you are aware of Nostr in the first place. Introducing a new protocol means introducing a new paradigm. \n\nI guess the hypothesis relies on this implied potential snowball effect of more adoption leading to more adoption, and i think we just need to grind ourselves to ruin in the blind faith we will eventually start to catch snow.\n\nThe reason for the devotion being, that we have a long list of serious problems, a lot of them need addressing quick (or the state will making things even worse), and Nostr is in my estimation the most sensible route to take to tackle this; it might not be perfect but its by far the best we have. \n\nI already accepted i am some 300-style zealot faced against some FANG-Xerxes, and will persist in my delusion we will win."}