{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"Rob1Ham wrote","author_name":"Rob1Ham (npub1em…ac9aw)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub1emdtsxly9m68m00x206t574jttp65vk0c2m89ms038q047yz7ylqcac9aw","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"Important to call out Dathon Ohm is now lying (misleading?) the consensus process by removing the rejected langauge about a reactive activation method, but may have to employ it anyway?\n\nIt'll get circulated once the new proposal comes out, deceit is not how you build rough consensus.\n\nnevent1qqszllafk56y6mwwch9w3eu6u48dzn0wrmfdynlftlrhky3uy56tu8c0c6dc5\n\n"}