{"type":"rich","version":"1.0","title":"t® |g∆ |hç/√\\ wrote","author_name":"t® |g∆ |hç/√\\ (npub1ll…uveh7)","author_url":"https://nostr.now/npub1ll2l4chxxc6p725va4adxcpt8jszrkn4xya750htq68r0zln65hs9uveh7","provider_name":"njump","provider_url":"https://nostr.now","html":"Honest and provocative questions.\n1) Why should they cut the tree they are living on? \n2) Why do we have to assume they ALWAYS have a plan for everything? \n3) And, more importantly, if so, self custody wouldn't have been taken into account as a minor nuisance to cope with in the master plan / grand scheme of things?\nReally, why todays' Saylor's / BlackRocks' / Andy Back's suitcoin would be a resistance tool and not part of their solution?\n If they are so powerful and allmighty do do we really think that self custody of a captured / increasingly centralized / non-widespread-MoE asset can make any difference against this Leviathan? Today Bitcoin's salvific belief sounds much to me like 'you can vote them out this time' meme.\n"}