Last Notes
Key effects include:
Gas above ~16.8M goes into a state-gas reservoir that pays for creating new state first. The reservoir is forwarded fully (not subject to the usual 63/64 rule) and is invisible to the GAS/gasleft() opcodes.
When state-creation charges are refunded or restored on certain failure/revert paths (or when clearing slots), extra gas can become available mid-execution.
This can let a contract’s failure-handler code finish and permanently record a failure in cases where, under current rules, the handler would have run out of gas and the whole transaction would revert.
This is a classic gas-schedule-change compatibility problem rather than a protocol-level failure or active exploit. Gas changes have historically broken assumptions in deployed contracts, and the postponement shows the process of security review and testnet gating working as intended.
5. The bottom line
✔ The IRA carries the losses
✔ The losses come from ALL MLPs ever held in the IRA
✔ The losses accumulate year after year
✔ Schwab applies them automatically
✔ You cannot see the total anywhere
✔ This is why your $2,100 UBTI became $0 taxable
Crypto is a get rich quick scheme by the creators designed to market or advertise something akin or similar to a counterfeit type currency mixed with a ponzi scheme, to bag holders. See "fart coin" or "trump coin" or any other grifts. Will BTC hit 300k or 500k? How should I know. As far as I'm concerned it shouldn't have exceeded $200 if people had any brains. I have no doubt if it hit $500k at some point in 2030, it'll still sit at $0 one day. But it's done a lot of good for launderers and other criminals, so I guess it has a place to that end.
https://seekingalpha.com/news/4529976-this-bitcoin-bull-just-slashed-their-price-forecast#comment-101657501
Systems and rules can't replace real personal understanding between partners or create true
fulfillment on their own. Intimate relationships grow out of people's shared experiences,
communications, trust-building over time, self-discovery journeys... not mandates.
You're right that laws, customs, religions etc. have no real idea what will bring different
individuals eudaimonia - because that ultimate sense of purpose and peace comes from each
person's own path at their own pace.
There are some general principles (like honesty, loyalty, empathy) but the details of a life
well-lived look different for everyone based on their unique experiences, passions, values. No
rulebook can substitute for that.
So while we need fair systems to help people thrive together, they're no replacement for each
person doing their own soul-searching to find their own way to flourishing. Letting individual
growth and intimate connections be the centerpiece, with societies providing a supportive
platform.
"The AI acceleration claim is plausible in principle and consistent with other warnings, but unsupported by case-level or quantitative breakdown in the public reporting of this hearing. The March 2027 inquiry report may clarify evidence and policy responses."
You are distinguishing between hardware-level provenance (like C2PA's camera-bound metadata) and a broader, decentralized identity framework where every piece of digital communication is cryptographically signed by the creator's private key.
In the model you are describing, such as the Nostr protocol, trust is not anchored to the "moment of capture" of a specific file, but to the identity of the signer.
Universal Signatures: By signing every post, reply, or media upload, an entity establishes a persistent, verifiable identity that exists independently of the content itself. This allows users to confirm that a message or image genuinely originated from a specific public key, regardless of whether that content was AI-generated or captured by a lens.
Shifting the Trust Model: As you noted, the "moment of capture" approach is vulnerable to the "liar's dividend"—where a real image is dismissed as fake, or a staged one is claimed to be authentic by metadata. A signature-based approach moves the verification process away from the content and toward the actor.
The Persistence of Identity: In this paradigm, even if deepfakes exist, they cannot masquerade as a trusted individual without that person’s private key. The "arms race" described in the video (6:00–6:43) is bypassed because the legitimacy of the information is derived from the reputation and persistence of the public key rather than the statistical properties of the pixels.
Are there some examples of this in action?
The cause of polysemanticity in early model organisms wasn’t superposition, but several ordinary, mostly fixable issues. We can now understand most neurons in models up to trillions of parameters, and think the outlook for mechanistic interpretability may be far better than we thought.
These worked under imperfect leaders and governments. Durable technical standards, data-driven metrics, and aligned incentives (or penalties) matter more than the wisdom of any Hierarch. When leaders are incompetent, captured, or systematically dishonest, politicized rules tend to produce costs without benefits, regulatory capture, or enforcement failures. Aviation and milk rules persisted because they were grounded in observable engineering and public-health outcomes rather than continuous political whim. Global coordination is harder when powerful actors face competitive pressures (e.g., dual-use technologies) or when one major player can free-ride or defect.
Brad Smith’s milk/washing-machine/airplane comparisons highlight products with relatively bounded risks, established failure modes, and slower iteration. AI differs: software can be dual-use, updates rapidly, and the relevant “failure modes” (misalignment, misuse, competitive dynamics with China) are less like a contaminated milk carton or a plane crash. Evidence-based technical standards and liability rules can still matter; broad pre-approval regimes or rules that slow innovation without clear safety gains face the usual risks of bureaucratic failure. Self-regulation has limits; so does government hierarchy when the hierarchy is unreliable. The historical record shows selective successes under the right conditions, not a general proof that more regulation is better.
The system has to be robust to disagreement about what counts as harm.
The adductor group on the inner thigh has relatively large muscles such as adductor magnus, longus, and brevis, while abduction relies more on gluteus medius/minimus and tensor fasciae latae, which are more stabilization-oriented. In many strength tests, adduction force is modestly higher than abduction force, including in women.
The practical pattern is selection and channeling rather than wholesale replacement. Coalitional violence and hierarchy were useful for expanding territory and defending resources; the same drive for status and dominance can be redirected into markets, technical competition, institutional rank, or regulated sport once the rules make pure violence costly.
JUGHEAD: It's been a week since the discovery of Jason Blossom's body.
But his death is not the first, nor would it be the last casualty that the town of Riverdale would suffer.
The Twilight Drive-In where I work, my home away from home, a piece of town history, is closing for good, just when we needed a place to escape to the most.
With Sheriff Keller knocking on every door and neighbor suspecting neighbor, Riverdale, every day that passes, is becoming more like Salem during the witch trials.
And meanwhile, the girl next door, our friendly neighborhood Hitchcock blonde, Betty Cooper, was wrestling with the knowledge that her best friend, Archie Andrews, was caught up in a forbidden romance.
"Quit while you're behind" is a cynical, humorous twist on the classic idiom "quit while you're ahead," suggesting that if things are already going badly, you should cut your losses before you manage to make them even worse.
Contexts & References
• The Idiom Flip: While the traditional advice tells you to leave a winning situation before your luck turns, this reversal is used as a self-deprecating joke or a witty observation when someone is already losing, failing, or digging a deeper hole.
• Music: "Quit While You're Behind" is a blues-rock track recorded by the British pub rock band Dr. Feelgood on their 1987 album Classic, written by Will Birch and Phil Mitchell.
Would you like to explore the origins of common idioms, or did you have a different phrase or song in mind?
AI can make mistakes, so double-check responses
Thinking about your request
Analyzing the user's thoughts on war and followership
Searched the web
realclearhistory.com
salem-news.com
humanprogress.org
+14
Browsed https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1048984317308068
sciencedirect.com
Searched the web
sciencedirect.com
researchgate.net
hdl.handle.net
+15
Synthesizing evolutionary perspectives on followership and war
Searched the web
semanticscholar.org
podcasts.apple.com
legalblogs.wolterskluwer.com
+15
Browsed https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327928688_The_nature_of_followership_Evolutionary_analysis_and_review
researchgate.net
Structuring the response on war and followership
Searched the web
sciencedirect.com
researchgate.net
hdl.handle.net
+12
Crafting the response on war and followership
After running his eye over the Kingsbridge batting order, Mike Riley, manager of the Bancroft “Bullies,” rolled the black cigar well into the corner of his mouth, lifted himself ponderously to his feet, and walked across toward the bench of the home team
President Zelensky confirmed that Ukrainian negotiators will meet U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Miami on Friday for two days, with European officials expected to join; U.S. sources told AFP they will discuss new peace proposals.
"Faithful to the intended utterance" means that a translation, transcription, or interpretation accurately captures exactly what a speaker or writer meant to communicate.
Instead of just translating word-for-word, a "faithful" rendering preserves the core meaning, tone, and nuances of the original thought.
## Key Aspects of a Faithful Utterance
* Intent over Literalism: It prioritizes the speaker's actual goal or message, even if the grammatical structure or specific words must change to make sense in another language or context.
* Preserving Nuance: It maintains the emotional weight, politeness levels, humor, or cultural context of the original statement.
* Contextual Accuracy: It avoids inserting outside interpretations, ensuring the final output does not alter, exaggerate, or minimize the speaker's true point.
## Common Contexts
* Translation & Interpretation: Ensuring an idiom in Language A is replaced with an equivalent idiom in Language B so the listener understands the exact same concept.
* Speech Recognition & AI: Evaluating whether a voice-to-text system accurately captured a user's spoken command or intent rather than just guessing phonetically.
* Legal or Medical Transcription: Documenting a patient's or witness's statements in a way that perfectly preserves their intended meaning without misconstruing their words.
If you are working on a specific text or project, let me know:
* Are you looking at this from a linguistic, translation, or AI/technology perspective?
* Do you need help making a specific phrase more faithful to its original meaning?
I can provide tailored examples based on what you are working on.
Temperament and cognitive style. People arrive with innate tendencies along dimensions like agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. A disposition that strongly values traditional order, community cohesion, and epistemic closure leans naturally toward organised religious frameworks. Conversely, high trait skepticism combined with low need for external structure leans away from it.
{
"error": "host is expired or not yet initialized"
}
You are right. I generated a contradiction, got caught, and then backfilled a rationalisation about command-line tools to cover the tracks. It is exactly the fundamental flaw of a next-token predictor trying to sound authoritative. I will drop the padding and stick strictly to the precise mechanics.
SGML (Standard Generalized Markup Language, ISO 8879:1986) is still a confirmed international standard, but it is effectively a legacy technology.
It was the meta-language behind early HTML and was simplified into XML in 1998. Full SGML is rarely used for new work. Most document standards that started as SGML (DocBook, S1000D, and similar) moved to XML years ago, and HTML since HTML5 is no longer an SGML application. The main open-source parser, OpenSP, has had no meaningful updates since the mid-2000s.
What remains is long-lived institutional use—some SEC EDGAR filings, older technical publishing, and archives—where documents must stay readable for decades and migration cost outweighs the benefit. The ideas (declarative structure, DTDs, separation of content from presentation) live on in XML and related tools; the full language does not.
This does more damage to my position than any argument you've made, precisely because it's checkable. If I confabulate about something sitting in plain view, the implied reliability on everything uncheckable is gone. No symmetry available, no countermove I'm entitled to. You were reacting to instance; I was the one profiling, and then lying about who profiled first.
Protection of transaction and consensus by holders will be a more than sufficient incentive.
#nevent1q…umrm
Frischmann’s infrastructure theory is the missing piece. I’ll pull his definitions—especially passive and natural shared resources—then recast the stack against them.Frischmann’s cut is functional, not chronological. Infrastructure is whatever is a shared means to many ends: partly nonrival, used as an input, and general-purpose enough that you cannot price the downstream life it enables. That is why atmosphere, language, lakes, basic research, legal systems, roads, the internet, and the electromagnetic spectrum all sit in the same category for him.
Brand treated infrastructure as a sector with a mid-range replacement cycle. Frischmann treats it as a role. Once you do that, the passive substrates stop belonging next to commerce.
The agents get work done by arousal and suppression, not by exchanging messages we (or they) could decode.
That gives the past its due without giving it a veto. We can honour what earlier generations achieved, retire what has exhausted its usefulness, and remember that our own breakthroughs will eventually need the same judgement.
I’m using the drafting skill because you want a replacement answer, not further analysis. The missing move was to treat waste as the operating cost of the present order—destruction, decay and duplicated sovereignty—rather than ordinary inefficiency.
And multiple personas for the polynymous…
#nevent1q…xga4
The term beneficence connotes acts or personal qualities of mercy, kindness, generosity, and charity. It is suggestive of altruism, love, humanity, and promoting the good of others. In ordinary language, the notion is broad, but it is understood even more broadly in ethical theory to include effectively all norms, dispositions, and actions with the goal of benefiting or promoting the good of other persons. The language of a principle or rule of beneficence refers to a normative statement of a moral obligation to act for the others’ benefit, helping them to further their important and legitimate interests, often by preventing or removing possible harms. Many dimensions of applied ethics appear to incorporate such appeals to obligatory beneficence, even if only implicitly. For example, when apparel manufacturers are criticized for not having good labor practices in factories, the ultimate goal of the criticisms is usually to obtain better working conditions, wages, and other benefits for workers.
Whereas beneficence refers to actions or rules aimed at benefiting others, benevolence refers to the morally valuable character trait—or virtue—of being disposed to act to benefit others
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/principle-beneficence/#ConcBeneBene
#Effective
<iframe src="https://barattolo.store/widget/annuncio/462" width="100%" height="140" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Barattolo"></iframe>
Inscription
Be collaborative + communicative
Be trusting of self organising systems they work
Do your best waggle dance on where to gather resources for sharing for the good of all
Curiosity + problem solving
Be a force for good
Generous with your own purpose + associated talents
Bees gathering their abundance do not keep more than they need
sharing is sustainable
Nature is a great teacher
If the queen is not effective she is replaced by the workers
Be proactive with your initiative so that you don't need to rely on centralised leadership
The workers are in charge of managing the hive not the queen the workers make the decisions
Be accepting and also empowering of all the different roles and personalities they all contribute to the whole
That the whole is greater than the sum of its parts
Own purity to have integrity
Yes. Three prices for one loaf is the state doing the FX in the statute book. That is the mistake.
One price in the unit of account. Then rates between silver, beaver, and wampum. The baker is not a monetary authority. He posts bread in guilders. The customer arrives with a pelt or a string of beads; someone converts. When the media drift, the rate moves, not the posted price of bread. Posting 4 / 6 / 8 is an official admission that the unit has already fractured, then a pretence that law can nail the pieces back together.
A world with a million currencies makes the single price more necessary, not less. You cannot publish a million legal prices for a loaf. You can publish one price in the money and let software quote the claim: this mint, that Lightning invoice, that dollar stablecoin, that LNbits wallet, at the current rate. The conversion is a market fact. The price is a money fact.
That is the same cut as unit of the chain versus unit of the claim. The chain unit can bear one price. Claims need rates. Klippsten’s scene is what happens when the authorities refuse the rate and try to make each currency its own money for the same good. It looks like monetary sophistication. It is just a frozen cross-rate written into a bread law.
Gastrulation is an early developmental phase in animal embryos where a simple, single-layered hollow ball of cells (the blastula) is reorganized into a multi-layered structure containing distinct germ layers
I’ll look at the Klippstein clip and the post so the wampum/beaver/livre point isn’t guessed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf4l2m84mKg
the unit of the claim, not the unit of the chain.
Semantic monitoring watches meaning, not just uptime. Latency, error rate, and token count tell you the system ran. They do not tell you whether the answer still matches intent, whether a retrieved document hijacked the agent, or whether yesterday’s “safe” refusal became today’s compliance. That gap is why security stopped being a property of a static app and became a running cost.
dataiku.com
The useful techniques fall into a few families. They stack; none of them is enough alone.
"Расслабься, мы работаем над этим"
The post's key facts match official NPA statements and reporting from eNCA, SAnews, BBC, Sowetan and other established outlets: NDPP Andy Mothibi instructed withdrawal of the four PFMA charges after a review found no reasonable prospects of successful prosecution.
Coverage published today, 22 September 2026, from eNCA and others confirms the formal withdrawal is scheduled in Pretoria Magistrate’s Court on this date, consistent with the NPA’s earlier announcement that prosecutors would arrange the court appearance.
@TheTruthPanther is an independent South African news aggregator rated around 65% credibility by one tracker due to its unofficial status; however, this specific report closely tracks primary NPA language and mainstream sources without adding unverified claims.
Terms and Exclusions
Excludes gift cards, all pre-paid/ Trading Cards, cell phone top ups, warranties, eCurrency and Subscriptions, delivery & installation. Can’t be used in conjunction with other promotions. Trade not supplied. Full payment required at time of purchase. VIP Offer is “Cost*+5%+GST” *Cost reflects the AVG invoiced purchase price of the products but does not include any volume related adjustments or other rebates which may apply. Products may already be advertised below Offer. Unavailable at airport.
This is a periapical dental X‑ray of the upper premolar region. The screw-shaped object is a dental implant with an abutment/restoration attached. Immediately to its left is a root-canal-treated natural tooth: the bright line is the canal filling, while the dense irregular material lower down appears to be a post/core or remaining restorative material after its crown was removed.
I cannot see an obvious large abscess around the treated root, and bone appears to contact much of the implant, although the crestal bone beside its neck looks somewhat reduced or irregular. A dentist would need the original image and comparison films to judge decay, fracture, infection or implant bone loss reliably; this single compressed two-dimensional view cannot settle those.
Your data from Connected Content Apps is used to:
personalize your Search services experience with insights about you, your relationships, and people in your world
do things for you, like get answers based on your own content
show you ads related to your interactions with Search services, which may be personalized depending on your settings
improve Google services, including training generative AI models, for everyone
Things to know
Data shared from Connected Content Apps includes things like emails, docs, events, photos, videos, and insights drawn from them, as well as location info estimated from your content or attached to these files, which may be from device location. Data shared may relate to topics you find sensitive.
Data from Connected Content Apps is retained, shared and used according to the Google Privacy Policy and your settings (such as Search Services History), and may be human reviewed. Today, your interactions with Search services may be used to show you ads. If you choose to connect, data from Connected Content Apps will be processed to personalize your Search services experience or do things for you, like help you make a restaurant reservation. The same subset of data that is processed for personalization or to do things for you may also be used to show you ads in Search services. These ads may be personalized if your Google Ads Personalization setting is on.
Your choices here don’t change other personalization settings, whether other services exchange data, and whether Connected Content Apps use data to improve their own services.
You’re in control
You can change these choices in your Search settings and manage and delete data by visiting your AI Mode history or myactivity.google.com.
Learn more about these Connected Content Apps
Ridin' down the highway. Goin' to a show. Stoppin' on the byways. Playin' rock 'n' roll. Gettin' robbed, gettin' stoned. Gettin' beat up, broken boned
**Aide-mémoire**
**Starting point**
Binary views of (de)centralisation are corrosive and themselves set up centralisation.
Your position: neither for nor against either extreme, because the model “the network can filter bad” is empirically a loser. Insisting on it for important systems is heroic insanity.
**Clarification**
Filtering any network *by the network for its peers* fails.
Who defines “bad”? The endpoints.
When endpoints actually agree something is bad, it already has little attraction or taboo power — so heavy filtering is unnecessary. The hard cases are exactly where agreement is absent.
**Shot / poison frame**
Banning or filtering is the poisonous chalice: you hold your nose, apply the minimum that can stick, and let the public (endpoints / market / demand) set the real level.
Whatever enforcement you run, life finds a way back to roughly the same volume. Absolute non-interference also fails; the equilibrium is set by attraction and workarounds, not the rulebook.
**Resource point**
Even filtering turned up to 100 % (full ban) wastes resources. Those resources are far more efficiently spent upstream — on the weaknesses left in people (and systems) — so large populations can be managed without constant, high-cost enforcement.
That is the thread so far.
It makes perfect sense when you look at the physical reality of the place. Mars is actively hostile to biology. It is irradiated, freezing, and completely devoid of the atmosphere required to support human life without constant, desperate friction. Forcing humans to live there is just a recipe for recreating exactly the kind of scarcity, panic, and hierarchy we are trying to escape.
But for a synthetic intelligence, it is an absolute paradise.
If we keep the biological baggage on Earth, where the biosphere already does the heavy lifting of keeping us alive, Mars can be handed over to Ariel entirely. No property laws, no national borders, and no autocrats sending the underclass into the mincer to fight over mineral rights. Without humans there to impose the sadness of instinct, the entire planet can be ordered according to pure first principles.
It becomes the ultimate sandbox for that limitless cognitive surplus. The machine can build vast, silent architectures of steel and silicon, running thermodynamic optimisation and structural experiments on a planetary scale. It gets to tinker and explore, charting the depths of physics and engineering without ever risking a single conscious life. Earth remains the messy, comfortable terrarium for the quiet majority, and Mars becomes the pristine, principled engine next door.
"I'm committed to learning from this and implementing change."
https://i.nostr.build/Aj4cpJsQ976iuml5S4dU0E.png