Nostr notes by buckyfonds

Talking on many of these topics is not cheap, especially with ...

2026-09-24T07:48:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…v4va
_________________________

Talking on many of these topics is not cheap, especially with your face out there in the public.

It is only cheap if you are controlled opposition, and controlled actors tend to talk about Left vs Right theater (horizontal), and not vertical (people vs One World Government).

The idea is to convert as many people to our side as possible.

Why would these topics be so heavily censored if talking about them didn't matter.

Of course, you need to take action to improve your own live and the lives of your loved ones, no one is going to do it for you.

I appreciate anyone exposing the fact that we live under a tyrannical One World Government that wants to enslave/kill you, because once you are aware, you are much more difficult to trick into working against yourself/your community.

Doesn't have to be.

2026-09-24T07:39:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…xqg3
_________________________

Doesn't have to be.

A few months ago a couple of Indian doctors sued the Indian ...

2026-09-24T07:38:58Z

A few months ago a couple of Indian doctors sued the Indian government to prove that viruses exist.

It took the government 4 months to respond with: "Trust me bro, I have credentials".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8YMQlU6Rw8

Over 700,000 people had watched the stream of the court hearing and then YouTube deleted it 😂

People are waking up to fake viruses, fake nuclear weapons, fake space, fake money, fake politics, fake authority, and all of this fake "science".

More and more people are aware that we live under something very close to a One World Government.

This is how we win eventually.

If our situation were hopeless, they wouldn't need all of this propaganda and all of these fake democracies.

The implications of more and more people realizing that viruses don't exist are massive.

The entire modern health-security state is built around a fake enemy category that converts ordinary toxicity, malnutrition, stress, environmental poisoning, medical treatment injury, social collapse, and industrial damage into a contagious-invader story.

This requires a civilization-level misdirection and depopulation system.

Sure, most are useful idiots, but the Satanic pedos at the top are all part of the club.

At the top level, there is no Russia vs Ukraine, USA vs China, Israel vs Iran.

It's all a big club and at the level that we can see, Secret Societies run the world (with the Jesuits likely at the highest level).

Once enough people realize that we live under a One World Government, all their theater falls apart.

More on the topic:

quoting
nevent1q…7yky

How the World works 👇️ (at the level that we can see)

As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), we've lived under something very close to a One World Government for a long time.

But how does it actually work (at the level that we can see)?

At the level that we can see, the World is run by secret societies (it's really just 1 secret society with different names).

This was exposed in Italy with the Propaganda Due (P2) scandal. The lodge was originally formed in 1877 as Propaganda massonica. (More on this below)

They also blew the whistle (revelation of the method) with the TV series Prison Break.

"The Company" (= the Controllers) is the main antagonistic faction of Prison Break. It is a secret group of multinational corporate alliances known only by those who work for them or oppose them. Its influence and power over individuals stretches to the White House, controlling every decision the country makes.

The Company holds control over the government's sway on energy and the country's economy.

The Company is an international organization, so they have agendas and operations that they pursue all over the World. These include a 1995 incident in Berlin, a Nigeria incident, a Comrie Group incident, as well as several others.

"Scylla" is an external hard drive primarily located within The Company's main headquarters. The hard drive is said to hold reports and other personnel information on all of its current and former operatives.

In the US, The Company has operatives in:
- FBI, CIA, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals, U.S. Treasury, U.S. Army, etc.

Now let's step into the Real World - the Propaganda Due Masonic Lodge in Italy - as this model is replication in every country in the World.

Propaganda Due (P2) "was" one of the most controversial secret societies in modern European history.

Originally founded in Italy in 1877 as a private Masonic lodge, P2 later became associated with political manipulation, financial scandal, intelligence networks, organized crime, and some of the most disturbing events in post-war Italian history.

At first, P2 is alleged to have existed as a discreet Masonic lodge for members of the Italian parliament who wished to become Freemasons while keeping their membership hidden from the Roman Catholic Church.

By the late twentieth century, however, it had transformed into something far more dangerous: a secret network of businessmen, politicians, intelligence officials, financiers, military figures, and criminals running Italy.

P2 was part of the wider world of Italian Freemasonry, where political life, secrecy, and elite networking overlapped.

We start getting interesting info from around the late 1960s when P2 is under the leadership of the businessman Licio Gelli.

After Gelli's appointment as master in 1975, he was able to gather together in secret at least a thousand prominent individuals, mainly politicians and State administrators.

By 1981, when police seized P2's records, the scale of its influence shocked Italy. Its membership list reportedly included:
- 3 Italian cabinet ministers
- 43 members of the Italian parliament
- The heads of all Italy’s intelligence agencies
- Military officers
- Businessmen
- Journalists
- Financiers
- Public officials
- Prominent conservative figures

The discovery showed that P2 had practically run the state, including the security apparatus, and the country's finances.

P2 also run the highest levels of organized crime in Italy. Mafia-linked members included Michele Greco, rumoured to be the capo dei capi of Italy, and Michele Sindona, the lodge treasurer. Sindona was a wealthy financier who managed Mafia profits from the transatlantic heroin trade.

P2 had become the place where finance, politics, intelligence operations, and organized crime intersected.

I'm not breaking any news, but drug-trafficking (and child-trafficking) into the US (and pretty much any other country) is also State-run, and the State is Secret Society-run.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had a close relationship with the Vatican Bank.

Despite the Roman Catholic Church’s official ban on Masonic membership, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, head of the Vatican Bank, became associated with P2. Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi served as major financial advisers to the Vatican.

Calvi, together with Marcinkus, was accused of helping create hundreds of fictitious bank accounts through which Mafia drug money was laundered.

Pope Paul VI had placed a large portfolio of Vatican investments under Sindona’s control in 1969, a decision that reportedly cost the Vatican around $240 million in losses by 1975.

Organized religion is intended for control. You don't need middlemen to tell you what your relationship to the Creator is. You need to find it yourself.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had ties to terrorism. Its members staged at least one major terrorist attack: the bombing of Bologna railway station in 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.

The Bologna bombing remains one of the darkest events in modern Italian history.

P2 is also likely involved in the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I. The Pope had begun closely examining Vatican finances. On 28 September 1978, he reportedly announced his intention to remove Archbishop Marcinkus and three other Sindona protégés from the Vatican Bank.

The next morning, he was found dead.

No autopsy was performed, and allegations of suppressed or destroyed evidence have followed the case ever since. Officially, the death has not been proven to be murder.

The P2 scandal deepened further in 1982 with the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, Italy’s largest private bank. Its head, Roberto Calvi, was closely connected to P2, the Vatican Bank, and the financial networks around Sindona and Gelli.

Banco Ambrosiano collapsed after being stripped of approximately $1.4 billion in assets.

The aftermath was marked by "mysterious" deaths.

Calvi was found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London. A coroner’s inquest initially called the death suicide, but his widow challenged that verdict. She presented evidence that Calvi had intended to reveal the names of those involved in P2's operations. The verdict was later changed to "cause of death unknown".

On the same day Calvi was found dead in London, his longtime secretary reportedly committed "suicide" by leaping from a window in the Banco Ambrosiano building.

The symbolism of Blackfriars Bridge also became part of the story. “Blackfriars” was interpreted by some as a possible reference to Freemasonry, adding another layer of mystery to Calvi’s death.

After the Banco Ambrosiano collapse, P2’s leading figures allegedly came under increasing pressure.

Licio Gelli (the Venerable Master of the Propaganda Due) lodge, vanished from a Swiss prison cell while being held for extradition. Michele Sindona died in a Milanese prison, claiming that he had been poisoned.

So Licio Gelli was arrested in Switzerland in 1982 for his role in the Banco Ambrosino scandal and the Bologna massacre but managed to escape from prison the next year.

He eventually agreed to surrender into the custody of Swiss authorities for a short period of time in 1987.

From 1996 until his death in 2015, Gelli remained in house arrest at his home in Arezzo (Italy).

Imaging murdering a bunch of people, collapsing Banco Ambrosiano in 1982 (a "black hole" of $1.4 billion), escaping from prison, etc., to get house arrest.

This model is replicated throughout the entire world.

For example, in Britain, the Fabian Society has supplied every Labour Prime minister in history. 141 of 411 Labour MPs are members. More than half the cabinet.

Short video on Britain - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiUV0rM9v7s

Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep's clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain's oldest political think tank. Their strategy, which they openly called "permeation," was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labour's constitution, etc.

But the part they'd rather you didn't examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilisation and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society's council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it.

In the US, George Bush and John Kerry, both members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale University, ran against each other in the 2004 presidential election.

I see the same thing in my country - all of the institutions are run by Freemasons and have been for at least 30-40 years.

So, vote harder, daddy.

As a member of a secret society, your oath is to the brotherhood, and betraying a brother = death.

If you've looked into the Old World (e.g. Tartaria), there is plenty of evidence that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history.

There have likely been multiple resets.

Videos on the topic:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3

Freemasonry could mean "free masonry" - as in they acquired Old World buildings for free.

They've likely managed to preserve technology/knowledge after resets which gives them a massive advantage in this game.

Andrew Carnegie started the great public library movement of the 19th century.

He "funded" the construction of more than 2500 libraries worldwide.

Although, there is no evidence of most of these "libraries" being constructed - he just used Old World buildings.

Many families donated their old books to these libraries, and many of the books were eventually slowly replaced/changed with goy slop books.

As Rockefeller said: "I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers".

quoting
nevent1q…xej8
Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know viruses exist?

Mr Scientist: Trust the science, mr. Goy.

Viruses don't exist which means your government has been trying to maim/kill you, your family and your pets/cattle with vaccines for a very long time.

It also means we've been living under a One World Government for a very long time.

Will the Indians finally isolate a virus?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J52m2lHyVNE

Dr. Tom Cowan does a great job of summarizing why viruses don't exist in this video.

https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

Probably the best podcast I've listened to in years. Jason ...

2026-09-23T08:25:34Z

Probably the best podcast I've listened to in years.

Jason Christoff & Makia Freeman: War Drums, European Conscription, Mind Control & Cult Deprogramming

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClWaP1VCCFI

Jason Christoff is also the guy who made the "Planet Mind Control" documentary. Worth a watch.

https://rumble.com/v7a9ih4-documentary-planet-mind-control-jason-christoff.html

Nostr event nevent1qqs9k47pygn4g9n87je9d8axahff7akpt5ny44khqtn78lh4sy6easczyqckazld8jvvsamppq7qa6nx950w6d4c4gvur3lq9taglj9t5qzv5va09gy

2026-08-31T14:05:24Z

#AlexJonesEnergy

quoting
nevent1q…uhr5
Fuck Justin Biebler and the police state!

nevent1q…y58h

I don't know of any good alternative. The only Twitter ...

2026-08-30T16:12:39Z

In reply to nevent1q…lcp7
_________________________

I don't know of any good alternative.

The only Twitter web-viewer I know of that still works is:
- https://carryfeed.com/

However, its UI is not good.

I haven't looked into running my own Nitter instance or creating a shadow account because I don't need to read twitter posts that bad.

My guess is Twitter shadow account (fake, single-use email + VPN) is the simplest alternative for now. Can also delete account and recreate new one with different email/VPN from time to time.

It was a joke. I don't know much about Justin Bieber, but ...

2026-08-30T15:26:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…p9l5
_________________________

It was a joke.

I don't know much about Justin Bieber, but many cases of child stars successfully deprogramming themselves around the age of 30.

Some speculate MK Ultra programming starts to wear off around 30.

Fuck Justin Biebler and the police state! ...

2026-08-30T14:24:52Z

Fuck Justin Biebler and the police state!

quoting
nevent1q…y58h

"Imagine if voting worked." 😂 (Spoiler alert - it ...

2026-08-28T14:48:50Z

"Imagine if voting worked." 😂

(Spoiler alert - it doesn't)

They are not fearmongering with the number itself, but with the ...

2026-08-28T11:07:34Z

In reply to nevent1q…d6ms
_________________________

They are not fearmongering with the number itself, but with the exponential growth, and to get the exponential growth you need greater numbers.

Just looking at the article associated with the pic I've posted
- https://silverchips.mbhs.edu/content/save-the-planet-have-fewer-children-30302/

"It took more than 150,000 years for our population to reach just one billion . By 1900, there were nearly two billion people on the planet, and by 2000, more than six billion. The exponential nature of this growth is stunning and alarming. The United Nations predicts that, by 2050, our population will be at 9.6 billion people. Our current trends indicate that one billion people will be added to earth's population every twelve years. "
"
Our population growth is astronomical. This growth might be sustainable if we had the natural resources to accommodate it, but we don't. In 1965, humans used only 70 percent of the natural resources the planet could regenerate or repair each year; meaning the Earth's natural processes could more than make up for the resources used by humans. That is no longer the case. By the beginning of this decade, we used up the natural resources of 1.4 Earths. As the worldwide population continues to grow exponentially, and natural resources can't regenerate fast enough, we will continue to degrade and destroy our environment. Our land, our forests and our seas will continue to suffer the consequences of this exponential growth.
"

The emphasis is on the exponential growth. The greater number they come up with, the more exponential the growth, the more fearmongering.

I guess you want to argue semantics. An advanced civilization is ...

2026-08-28T10:57:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…krh5
_________________________

I guess you want to argue semantics.

An advanced civilization is one that is characterized by highly developed technology, advanced knowledge systems, energy control and complex organization.

And in all of your comments you assume that the current civilization is the most advanced.

Again, you assume to know how conditions have varied over time.

Archeology, like most other sciences, is completely captured, but feel free to defer to the Vatican, the Smithsonian, UNESCO, etc.

I'm sure if they've discovered something that contradicts the mainstream narrative, they would've instantly come clean and rewritten history.

You can't get reliable information on current events, but you somehow believe to be getting reliable information on events that might've happened or might not have happened hundreds/thousands of years ago, and even from an alleged architect from the 1st century BC (Vitruvius), who may or may not have existed.

Not sure if I'm chatting with ChatGPT or just someone who recites the official narrative.

Your comment assumes that this is the most advanced civilization ...

2026-08-28T10:13:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…0pmj
_________________________

Your comment assumes that this is the most advanced civilization to have ever existed, and there were never any resets for 2000+ years.

There's evidence that there have been resets and it is speculated that there was one around the 1700s. You can check out "My Lunch Break" and many others for alternate timelines.

So according to the mainstream narrative: ...

2026-08-28T09:18:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…0v9c
_________________________

So according to the mainstream narrative:

That's cool if you want to believe that.

I'd like to see the muscle, hand tools, horses, basic hoists, and primitive cranes they used to build e.g. Sistine Chapel which was built between 1473 and 1481, it was then painted by Michelangelo between 1508 and 1512.

If it was created by the government, it was created to serve a ...

2026-08-27T03:49:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…vuhs
_________________________

If it was created by the government, it was created to serve a specific purpose. It wouldn't change what Bitcoin is, nor does it guarantee that they're never going to want to kill it.

I mentioned this more in relation to Bitcoin being marketed as this mythical, anti-establishment technology that governments are so afraid of, which it is clearly not.

Jeff Booth presented it as governments trying to kill it because it threatens them so much.

I mentioned they are unlikely to kill it because there are more adversarial alternatives available, and it serves as a useful decoy (which is what its likely purpose was).

This of course doesn't guarantee that they're never going to want to kill it.

Still, Bitcoin has been a massive net positive for the Controllers and a massive net negative for the freedom money movement.

I am sure there are many warring factions at the lower levels, doesn't seem like it at the highest levels though.

I meant to write, some type of gold-plated foil notes, not ...

2026-08-26T13:00:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…dq8v
_________________________

I meant to write, some type of gold-plated foil notes, not Goldbacks specifically.

Haven't looked into this, but I'd assume there would be a way to get around the gold foil notes patents, and at some point you kind of have to take a stand when laws are unreasonable.

> "What are your thoughts on 98% of miners (US, China, the ...

2026-08-26T12:48:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…sy28
_________________________

> "What are your thoughts on 98% of miners (US, China, the rest) acting as one?"

I think China and the US are controlled by the same actors, and we live under something very close to a One World Government.

I've covered this here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world

I've written about the mining issue here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem

TL;DR from article

Mining pools such as MARA (USA) and F2Pool (China) have already done “OFAC-compliant“ Bitcoin mining (transaction censorship).

MARA (previously Marathon Digital Holdings) became the first North American Enterprise Miner to produce fully AML and OFAC-compliant Bitcoin.

Marathon abandoned the experiment within weeks amid industry backlash and to align with Bitcoin Core 0.21.1/Taproot signaling, saying they would validate like everyone else (no censorship).

A developer called 0xB10C caught F2Pool filtering transactions and their co-founder Chun Wang acknowledged:
- "Will disable the tx filtering patch for now, until the community reaches a more comprehensive consensus on this topic."

Chun Wang previously wrote (in a now deleted post):
- "Why do you feel surprised when I refuse to confirm transactions for those criminals, dictators and terrorists? I have every right not to confirm any transactions from Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, don’t I? Meanwhile, CZ is selling his soul for money. He deserves."

So both MARA and F2Pool have deliberately filtered OFAC-sanctioned transactions despite them having competitive fee related to all other added transactions.

Analyses of the first MARA “clean” block (height 682,170) focused on lower fees and excluded transactions. BitMEX Research noted the block contained ~0.0033 BTC less in fees than a normal maximized template would have, implying foregone revenue.

So these mining pools decided to lose fee revenue, trashed their reputation and eventually reverted to standard, non-censoring validation.

MARA is an American company while F2Pool is based in China, but somehow they’ve both done OFAC transaction censorship. I’ve already explained how this coordination works in a separate article.

The rivalry between China and the US is mostly theater, and that is one of the main reasons mining centralization is such a big problem for Bitcoin.

---

After Covid (the great One World Government reveal), you'd have to be delusional to think that large mining pools are not state-controlled and that "competing" states are not incentive-aligned.

The governments of the US and China want the same thing - more control over the plebs, more obedience.

The real battle is citizens vs the State, not State vs State.

Every state protects force + money issuance. At all costs. Fiat/CBDC is the control layer, not a policy choice.

The only reason Bitcoin mining looks decentralized to the average pleb is because it is allowed to look decentralized (for now).

I wrote more about Bitcoin mining centralization here:

quoting
nevent1q…xfqw
Your screenshot basically states: propaganda exists and is bad, and Bitcoin mining is not centralized.

I have written about mining centralization here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem

Your article lost me at "Transactions have never been censored".

Mining pools such as MARA and F2Pool have already done “OFAC-compliant“ Bitcoin mining (transaction censorship).

It's quite simple:
- Bitcoin's mining "decentralization" lives or dies at the template layer, not at hashrate.
- As long as pools (not miners) pick transactions, the State can steer settlement via perimeter levers (power, banks, insurers, export controls, app-store rules, cloud/mempool policy).

At present, a regulator only needs to influence a few pool operators, not thousands of ASIC owners.

Does this sound decentralized or centralized.

I guess, your theory is that if censorship becomes too draconian, more mining pools will be formed and we'll have, say, 15 pools instead of 6-7 which would be more decentralized.

In theory, 15 pools would be more difficult to influence than 6-7, but would you rather have template control in the hands of thousands of ASIC owners (e.g. OCEAN-model pools), or 15 StratumV1 pools.

If it were that simple and miners were rational, not-state-controlled actors, you'd have way more than 2% of the hashrate using the OCEAN model.

The theory "if it gets bad, all participants will act in the best interest of the network because they are rational and incentivized to do so" already failed once a few weeks ago.

It is great theory if you want a false sense of security though.

Your screenshot basically states: propaganda exists and is bad, ...

2026-08-26T11:02:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…g02a
_________________________

Your screenshot basically states: propaganda exists and is bad, and Bitcoin mining is not centralized.

I have written about mining centralization here:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoins-mining-centralization-problem

Your article lost me at "Transactions have never been censored".

Mining pools such as MARA and F2Pool have already done “OFAC-compliant“ Bitcoin mining (transaction censorship).

It's quite simple:
- Bitcoin's mining "decentralization" lives or dies at the template layer, not at hashrate.
- As long as pools (not miners) pick transactions, the State can steer settlement via perimeter levers (power, banks, insurers, export controls, app-store rules, cloud/mempool policy).

At present, a regulator only needs to influence a few pool operators, not thousands of ASIC owners.

Does this sound decentralized or centralized.

I guess, your theory is that if censorship becomes too draconian, more mining pools will be formed and we'll have, say, 15 pools instead of 6-7 which would be more decentralized.

In theory, 15 pools would be more difficult to influence than 6-7, but would you rather have template control in the hands of thousands of ASIC owners (e.g. OCEAN-model pools), or 15 StratumV1 pools.

If it were that simple and miners were rational, not-state-controlled actors, you'd have way more than 2% of the hashrate using the OCEAN model.

The theory "if it gets bad, all participants will act in the best interest of the network because they are rational and incentivized to do so" already failed once a few weeks ago.

It is great theory if you want a false sense of security though.

Man, I like Jeff Booth, but sometimes the statements he makes are ...

2026-08-26T10:02:45Z

Man, I like Jeff Booth, but sometimes the statements he makes are wild:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."
- "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"

Jeff is not like the other mainstream Bitcoin salesmen, in my opinion, he gives off good guy energy.

He's actually the guy who "orange-pilled" me and I've made lots of fiat on my Bitcoin trades.

He'd probably say that if I think in fiat terms, I don't understand Bitcoin, but I think that in order to really understand Bitcoin, you also have to understand how the world works.

If you don't understand how the world works, your attempts at Game Theory are worse than useless.

The people who focus only on understanding how the protocol works are too zoomed in to see the bigger picture.

The idealistic, protocol-centric scenario is unrealistic under a One World Government this tyrannical.

So I listened to a recent Jeff Booth podcast to see if he's updated his view on certain things, but he hasn't.

It's easy to tell because all of his podcasts are really just the same 1st principles presentation.

Going back to this quote:
- "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"

This of course assumes that Bitcoin is decentralized and secure.

I guess we'll have to ignore:
- 6-7 mining pools being close to 90% of the hash,
- Bitcoin Core being 80+% of the nodes,
- most retail users interacting through mobile wallets or browser extensions controlled by Apple and Google,
- increasingly more draconian on/off-ramp custody and surveillance,
- paperization practically destroying the 21M meme,
- crazy tax and regulatory frictions on payments,
- crazy Lightning Network centralization and regulation,
- significant portion of the reachable nodes being hosted on major cloud providers,
- centralized ASIC production,
- centralized out-of-the-box, noob-friendly hardware wallet production,
- etc.

Going back to this quote:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."

Let's assume that they can kill Bitcoin for a second.

Why in the world would they want to kill Bitcoin?

For 99% of cases, they'd rather you use Bitcoin than gold/silver, Monero or cash.

Unless you're moving tens/hundreds of millions of non-KYC Bitcoin to sponsor groups the Controllers don't like, they'd much rather you used Bitcoin than gold or cash.

As I've previously written, it is very likely Bitcoin was actually created by the government, so it makes very little sense for them to kill it in the current environment (with more adversarial alternatives available).

Can we at least stop pretending that Bitcoin in its current state is anti-establishment technology that makes our Jewish central bankers want to shut it down? That's just cringe.

For most Bitcoiners, the "have they co-opted Bitcoin test" is: "Is there a new block every ~10 minutes? (tick-tock, next-block?)"
- If yes, Bitcoin = not co-opted
- If no, Bitcoin = co-opted

Of course, this is a gross oversimplification - it focuses only on the protocol, while ignoring the policy and perimeter layers.

It's like saying: "If human breathing:"
- then human = healthy
- otherwise human = unhealthy

On this part:
- "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger"

My best attempt at pointing out where Bitcoin is stronger compared to 5-10 years ago:
- more people know about it (is good and bad),
- more hashrate (although insanely centralized, so doesn't mean much),
- higher fiat price (greater incentive to defend BTC),
- more people running nodes (although ordinary user nodes are at the bottom of the food-chain),
- more client decentralization (although Core still at 80%+).

So, a more honest Bitcoin pitch:
- Hey, we've got this thing that:
- might go up in fiat terms,
- is very easy and convenient to transport across borders,
- might protect you against the Great Taking if self-custodied properly,
- is very CIA/MO$$AD, MI6-aligned, so they've got no incentive to kill it.

Think of it as a stock of a blue-chip company, but a stock you can self-custody.

So, essentially similar to a paper stock certificate of a Blue-Chip company that is Controllers-aligned (e.g. NVDA, MSFT, GOOG, AAPL, AMZN, etc.).

This is the honest pumper Bitcoin pitch.

Not - "We are about to separate money and state (... after we get permission from the state), and the Jewish bankers are pissing their pants."

quoting
nevent1q…xg93
I don't think there was ever a chance for mass BTC adoption.

With both BTC and BSV (and to a lesser extent Monero), there are too many footguns. Too many ways for things to go wrong.

You'd have a much better chance with a retard-proof solution.

E.g. something like goldbacks (easy to verify, would be easy to produce at lower markup).

Then you face the State head-on instead of slowly getting captured with loads of plausible deniability (invisible to most).

They'd try to outlaw goldbacks, and then you either fight for your freedom or consent to slavery.

This is a binary event that is obvious to everyone, instead of a 2-3 decade-long sly, roundabout battle most people are not equipped for, or even aware of.

Something as simple as Goldbacks matches a lot of the real Bitcoin/Monero spirit at an analog, local scale:
- Privacy/fungibility: every note looks like any other; no transaction graph.
- Thin Policy: no mempool, no templates, no opcodes.
- Minimal Perimeter: you only need physical meetups and social trust, not banks or app stores.
- Anti-paperization: the “wrapper” is literally the metal; you can’t create paper claims on a Goldback without stepping back into the dematerialized system.

The big costs:
- Goldbacks don’t scale to high-value remote transactions (shipping, weight, risk).
- They’re tied to gold’s volatility vs fiat in people’s heads.
- They’re hard to integrate with digital commerce.

Then:
- For global reach and digital commerce, you’d want a Monero-ish protocol (until its inevitable capture).
- For local daily trade, a Goldback-like instrument is much closer to the ideal: low coordination tax, low digital capture surface, high expropriation resistance.

You'd want to buy most of the basic necessities locally anyway. Relying on digital commerce for everything is participating in the slave system.

Most large retailers are really just the State in drag. Buying your basic necessities from someone that hates you and wants to keep you enslaved is a risky business.

Just look at a few photos of men/women from 50-100 years ago before goy slop was mainstream. The deterioration is obvious, but not so much when you're in the moment.

"How did we get here?" Freemasonry is Jewish. ...

2026-08-25T09:46:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…p94j
_________________________

"How did we get here?"

Freemasonry is Jewish.

"Masonic lodges are established all over the world to help us achieve our indipendence. Those pigs, the non-Jewish Masons, will never understand the final objects of Masonry."
- Theodor Herzl, 1897 Switzerland

So the goyim are likely fed goy slop Freemasonry (enough to be useful), and the good stuff is just for the Jews.

I guess your question is: "How did we get here?"

How did we get to the point where at the level that we can see, Jews control everything, have rewritten history, have probably invented most religions, have rewritten "science", and pretty much everything else.

And the answer is, I don't know.

1) We could just be farm animals in a simulation - basically the loosh energy theory.

Loosh energy refers to emotional or life-force energy generated from human experiences, particularly intense emotions like suffering, conflict, or worship, which some describe as being "harvested" by higher-dimensional beings.

So if the Creator of this place is a "computer programmer" of sorts, maybe this is just a very realistic simulation designed to harvest loosh energy.

2) Some form of "The Book of Enoch" could also be the case.

The Fall of Angels - the text describes the Watchers, a group of angels who descend to Earth and take human wives, leading to the birth of the Nephilim, hybrid beings that cause chaos and violence.

The Watchers also taught humanity forbidden knowledge, which led to widespread corruption and violence.

There are some theories that we are being ruled by the Watchers and the Nephilim (the offspring of these fallen angels).

3) It could also be a matter or who managed to survive the previous resets and preserve ancient knowledge/technology

If we assume that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history (which is a safe assumption IMO), imagine what advantage you'd have over ordinary plebs if you've managed to preserve pre-reset knowledge/technology.

Maybe things weren't going so great for the Controllers pre-reset, and they decided to wipe out the world (e.g. by use of Directed Energy Weapons).

If you had the technology and time and resources to plan, if executed cleanly, this would give you a massive advantage post-reset.

The current "Elites" seem to all be building bunkers for some reason. Could be to protect themselves from bombs, of course.

4) Our Controllers could also be beyond the Ice Wall

If you assume this Flat Earth map is roughly correct and there is an Ice Wall, our Controllers could be beyond the Ice Wall, so the Jews would be just the highest observable level.

It's kind of weird that all of the things that EVERY country on Earth agrees on have to do with enslaving the population - e.g. The Antarctic Treaty, fiat, vaccines.

The official narrative around the Antarctic Treaty (1959) makes no sense: 58 signatories, including the Soviet Union during the Cold War, so real hard cooperation in a rivalrous era.

The story that all countries agreed to not allow independent exploration to protect the penguins is prime goy slop.

Of course, this is all just speculation, so the answer is likely some combination/something completely different. There are too many layers to this deception.

However dark this place might be, doesn't mean we can't find a way to enjoy our time here.

Forgot to mention, Cody Snodgres who was a Black Ops and CIA ...

2026-08-24T09:14:47Z

In reply to nevent1q…r3qn
_________________________

Forgot to mention, Cody Snodgres who was a Black Ops and CIA operative also explained how much of this works:

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm1G-cCvbJU

How the World works 👇️ (at the level that we can see) As ...

2026-08-24T08:41:21Z

How the World works 👇️ (at the level that we can see)

As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), we've lived under something very close to a One World Government for a long time.

But how does it actually work (at the level that we can see)?

At the level that we can see, the World is run by secret societies (it's really just 1 secret society with different names).

This was exposed in Italy with the Propaganda Due (P2) scandal. The lodge was originally formed in 1877 as Propaganda massonica. (More on this below)

They also blew the whistle (revelation of the method) with the TV series Prison Break.

"The Company" (= the Controllers) is the main antagonistic faction of Prison Break. It is a secret group of multinational corporate alliances known only by those who work for them or oppose them. Its influence and power over individuals stretches to the White House, controlling every decision the country makes.

The Company holds control over the government's sway on energy and the country's economy.

The Company is an international organization, so they have agendas and operations that they pursue all over the World. These include a 1995 incident in Berlin, a Nigeria incident, a Comrie Group incident, as well as several others.

"Scylla" is an external hard drive primarily located within The Company's main headquarters. The hard drive is said to hold reports and other personnel information on all of its current and former operatives.

In the US, The Company has operatives in:
- FBI, CIA, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals, U.S. Treasury, U.S. Army, etc.

Now let's step into the Real World - the Propaganda Due Masonic Lodge in Italy - as this model is replication in every country in the World.

Propaganda Due (P2) "was" one of the most controversial secret societies in modern European history.

Originally founded in Italy in 1877 as a private Masonic lodge, P2 later became associated with political manipulation, financial scandal, intelligence networks, organized crime, and some of the most disturbing events in post-war Italian history.

At first, P2 is alleged to have existed as a discreet Masonic lodge for members of the Italian parliament who wished to become Freemasons while keeping their membership hidden from the Roman Catholic Church.

By the late twentieth century, however, it had transformed into something far more dangerous: a secret network of businessmen, politicians, intelligence officials, financiers, military figures, and criminals running Italy.

P2 was part of the wider world of Italian Freemasonry, where political life, secrecy, and elite networking overlapped.

We start getting interesting info from around the late 1960s when P2 is under the leadership of the businessman Licio Gelli.

After Gelli's appointment as master in 1975, he was able to gather together in secret at least a thousand prominent individuals, mainly politicians and State administrators.

By 1981, when police seized P2's records, the scale of its influence shocked Italy. Its membership list reportedly included:
- 3 Italian cabinet ministers
- 43 members of the Italian parliament
- The heads of all Italy’s intelligence agencies
- Military officers
- Businessmen
- Journalists
- Financiers
- Public officials
- Prominent conservative figures

The discovery showed that P2 had practically run the state, including the security apparatus, and the country's finances.

P2 also run the highest levels of organized crime in Italy. Mafia-linked members included Michele Greco, rumoured to be the capo dei capi of Italy, and Michele Sindona, the lodge treasurer. Sindona was a wealthy financier who managed Mafia profits from the transatlantic heroin trade.

P2 had become the place where finance, politics, intelligence operations, and organized crime intersected.

I'm not breaking any news, but drug-trafficking (and child-trafficking) into the US (and pretty much any other country) is also State-run, and the State is Secret Society-run.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had a close relationship with the Vatican Bank.

Despite the Roman Catholic Church’s official ban on Masonic membership, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, head of the Vatican Bank, became associated with P2. Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi served as major financial advisers to the Vatican.

Calvi, together with Marcinkus, was accused of helping create hundreds of fictitious bank accounts through which Mafia drug money was laundered.

Pope Paul VI had placed a large portfolio of Vatican investments under Sindona’s control in 1969, a decision that reportedly cost the Vatican around $240 million in losses by 1975.

Organized religion is intended for control. You don't need middlemen to tell you what your relationship to the Creator is. You need to find it yourself.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had ties to terrorism. Its members staged at least one major terrorist attack: the bombing of Bologna railway station in 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.

The Bologna bombing remains one of the darkest events in modern Italian history.

P2 is also likely involved in the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I. The Pope had begun closely examining Vatican finances. On 28 September 1978, he reportedly announced his intention to remove Archbishop Marcinkus and three other Sindona protégés from the Vatican Bank.

The next morning, he was found dead.

No autopsy was performed, and allegations of suppressed or destroyed evidence have followed the case ever since. Officially, the death has not been proven to be murder.

The P2 scandal deepened further in 1982 with the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, Italy’s largest private bank. Its head, Roberto Calvi, was closely connected to P2, the Vatican Bank, and the financial networks around Sindona and Gelli.

Banco Ambrosiano collapsed after being stripped of approximately $1.4 billion in assets.

The aftermath was marked by "mysterious" deaths.

Calvi was found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London. A coroner’s inquest initially called the death suicide, but his widow challenged that verdict. She presented evidence that Calvi had intended to reveal the names of those involved in P2's operations. The verdict was later changed to "cause of death unknown".

On the same day Calvi was found dead in London, his longtime secretary reportedly committed "suicide" by leaping from a window in the Banco Ambrosiano building.

The symbolism of Blackfriars Bridge also became part of the story. “Blackfriars” was interpreted by some as a possible reference to Freemasonry, adding another layer of mystery to Calvi’s death.

After the Banco Ambrosiano collapse, P2’s leading figures allegedly came under increasing pressure.

Licio Gelli (the Venerable Master of the Propaganda Due) lodge, vanished from a Swiss prison cell while being held for extradition. Michele Sindona died in a Milanese prison, claiming that he had been poisoned.

So Licio Gelli was arrested in Switzerland in 1982 for his role in the Banco Ambrosino scandal and the Bologna massacre but managed to escape from prison the next year.

He eventually agreed to surrender into the custody of Swiss authorities for a short period of time in 1987.

From 1996 until his death in 2015, Gelli remained in house arrest at his home in Arezzo (Italy).

Imaging murdering a bunch of people, collapsing Banco Ambrosiano in 1982 (a "black hole" of $1.4 billion), escaping from prison, etc., to get house arrest.

This model is replicated throughout the entire world.

For example, in Britain, the Fabian Society has supplied every Labour Prime minister in history. 141 of 411 Labour MPs are members. More than half the cabinet.

Short video on Britain - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AiUV0rM9v7s

Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep's clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain's oldest political think tank. Their strategy, which they openly called "permeation," was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labour's constitution, etc.

But the part they'd rather you didn't examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilisation and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society's council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it.

In the US, George Bush and John Kerry, both members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale University, ran against each other in the 2004 presidential election.

I see the same thing in my country - all of the institutions are run by Freemasons and have been for at least 30-40 years.

So, vote harder, daddy.

As a member of a secret society, your oath is to the brotherhood, and betraying a brother = death.

If you've looked into the Old World (e.g. Tartaria), there is plenty of evidence that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history.

There have likely been multiple resets.

Videos on the topic:
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3

Freemasonry could mean "free masonry" - as in they acquired Old World buildings for free.

They've likely managed to preserve technology/knowledge after resets which gives them a massive advantage in this game.

Andrew Carnegie started the great public library movement of the 19th century.

He "funded" the construction of more than 2500 libraries worldwide.

Although, there is no evidence of most of these "libraries" being constructed - he just used Old World buildings.

Many families donated their old books to these libraries, and many of the books were eventually slowly replaced/changed with goy slop books.

As Rockefeller said: "I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers".

They are accessible via archive.org (there are 4 pages - link to ...

2026-08-17T15:18:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…fus0
_________________________

They are accessible via archive.org (there are 4 pages - link to page 1 below):
- https://web.archive.org/web/20191018160039/https://www.usagold.com/goldtrail/archives/another1.html

I've gone over his posts in this article:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

Nostr event nevent1qqsfy6pydsn47l63aa2qarsq6yw7wg63tyyy80m40n3squ4mqtef7mszyqckazld8jvvsamppq7qa6nx950w6d4c4gvur3lq9taglj9t5qzv5npwcaa

2026-08-17T14:00:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…47ut
_________________________

I care because I was ~85-90% in BTC up until a few months ago and ...

2026-08-17T12:11:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…dpjw
_________________________

I care because I was ~85-90% in BTC up until a few months ago and then I started doing my own research.

The point is to seek and speak truth and form your own opinion.

I find this empowering. Some things you can't change and some things you can (on a local scale).

If this makes you feel bad, maybe don't read.

I posted the most common Bitcoin misconceptions in this article ( ...

2026-08-17T07:04:38Z

I posted the most common Bitcoin misconceptions in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).

Now, more people than ever are paying attention, so it's a good time to recap.

1) “There can only be 21M coins.”
Reality: Protocol caps base units at 21M BTC. Markets can (and already do) create synthetic claims (ETFs, futures, swaps, rehypothecated custodian balances) that exceed 21M. Price discovery then reflects claims supply, not just on-chain supply.
Implication: Paper-share ↑ ⇒ realized vol ↓; upside rallies capped; custody proof matters.

2) “Stock-to-flow proves long-term targets.”
Reality: S2F ignores synthetic supply, demand substitution (stables), and policy gating. Narrative comfort, not a pricing model.

3) “Hashrate up = security up, full stop.”
Reality: Pool control and policy clients determine censorship risk. Top pools ≈ majority of hashrate; pools, not individual miners, decide templates in most cases. DATUM/Stratum V2 are not ubiquitously enforced.
Implication: Watch pool policies, OFAC filtering, template standardization — not just hashrate charts.

4) “Miners can’t censor; the network routes around it.”
Reality: With a few pools coordinating templates/filters, effective censorship windows are feasible (delay/confiscate fees, exclude sets). Economic pressure (insurers, exchanges) makes templates converge.
Implication: Throughput is less of a limit than who writes the block template.

5) “51% attacks are unrealistic.”
Reality: A sustained double-spend is unlikely; policy-driven soft censorship via pools is very realistic and cheaper.
Implication: The live risk is transaction selection bias, not sensational double-spends.

6) “Protocol is immutable. It’s like TCP/IP.”
Reality: Consensus changes are rare, but policy-level changes (relay/size/standardness) shape what’s practically allowed.
Implication: “Immutability theater” can coexist with effective governance via defaults.

7) “User-activated soft forks prove ultimate user power.”
Reality: UASF worked in that instance with massive social coordination + aligned miners/exchanges. Don’t generalize; future coordination may face legal/app-store/bank choke points. Past upgrade processes (e.g., BIP9, BIP8, “Speedy Trial”) revealed that miners and coordinated developers can accelerate or block changes faster than ordinary users can veto. Power concentrates among aligned institutional actors.

(👆️ This was the entire premise for why BIP-110 was going to work.)

8) “It can’t be censored.”
- Reality: The perimeter censors (banks, app stores, exchanges, cloud), not necessarily the base layer. That’s enough to throttle adoption.
Implication: Watch wallet distribution policies, travel-rule hubs, blacklists.

9) “ETFs ‘legitimize’ Bitcoin.”
Reality: They paperize exposure, centralize voting/custody, and let Wall Street set the tape via derivatives basis and inventory.
Implication: Vol suppression ↑; adoption ↑ (in accounts); self-custody share ↓.

10) “If it’s better tech, people will adopt it.”
Reality: Convenience beats truth. Stables with KYC + superior UX win Medium-of-Exchange until incentives flip.
Implication: Bitcoin Store-of-Value containment is the base case; Medium-of-Exchange adoption requires mass incentives or policy failure.

11) “Education will fix it.”
Reality: Behavior follows defaults and rebates, not whitepapers. Policy can make stables default, apps can hide Bitcoin; outcomes follow.

12) “Institutional adoption = censorship resistance success.”
Reality: Institutionalization usually means perimeter compliance, paperization, and template steering.

These are just a few.

quoting
nevent1q…888h
Someone remind this chart that "it's just math" and "there can only ever be 21M".

The "hashrate up = security up" narrative is also dead - and for good reasons.

If you're asking for evidence that Bitcoin was created by the ...

2026-08-13T12:42:53Z

In reply to nevent1q…wv52
_________________________

If you're asking for evidence that Bitcoin was created by the government, it's circumstantial and incentives-based. Obviously, I wasn't there.

I've written about it here - https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

TL;DR

If you're asking for evidence that most outliers get identified early and hired by the government, Cody Snodgres and the OKC bombing has some great examples: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm1G-cCvbJU

I think it's kind of obvious that they'd hire the smartest people in the world. Even if they don't intend to use them, once hired by the government, they aren't on team plebs.

There are stories about pulling the smartest people out of military schools due to "injuries" and contracting them to do black ops.

I've only heard 1 guy admit that they tried to recruit him in high school but he declined. I'd imagine most people accept.

Yes mate, sadly "hodling our way to separating money and ...

2026-08-11T07:54:48Z

In reply to nevent1q…wd6u
_________________________

Yes mate, sadly "hodling our way to separating money and State because Bitcoin is perfect and invincible" is not a realistic scenario.

The influencers who push this sort of nonsense should be laughed out of the room.

Now that the BIP-110 saga is over, it's probably a good time ...

2026-08-11T06:59:32Z

Now that the BIP-110 saga is over, it's probably a good time to reflect.

In my opinion, BIP-110 failing is long-term good for BIP-110 supporters.

The BIP-110 question was:
- OK, Bitcoin mining is insanely centralized, so are the 5 mining pools (who share the same boss) going to get an order to do nothing, or will they be instructed to pretend that nodes actually matter?

From my old post "Who holds the Power in the Bitcoin ecosystem (does your node matter" - ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/who-holds-the-power-in-the-bitcoin ):
- Bitcoin does not run on ideals; it runs on coordination between code, hash, and liquidity — and those are controlled by a few dozen institutional actors who can synchronize quickly. Core defaults + pool templates + venue policies decide reality. Users matter only when they can coordinate economic liquidity, which is rare. Expect future changes to follow the same political playbook.

In that post, I put "ordinary user nodes" last in the power stack.

If BIP-110 had succeeded based on decentralization theater and misguided "game theory" circus, BIP-110 supporters would still be living a lie.

Stop listening to boomer Bitcoiners who tell you that "Bitcoin is decentralized and secure" and do some of your own research.

Bitcoin is not decentralized and secure, it was simply allowed to look that way ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-bitcoin-decentralized-and-secure ).

Until you realize that we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), your attempts at game theory are worse than useless.

Most people are just too mentally weak to face our current reality and would rather live a lie.

To understand why Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).

And no, "firing the miners" will not be nearly enough.

To understand why Bitcoin was most likely created by the government, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ).

If you are too heavily into Bitcoin and down bad on your position, I hope our jewish overlords give Saylor a $1 trillion loan at 0% interest so he can pump the BTC price.

Then, more people will focus on what actually matters:
- your health, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc.

Usually, as the governability of the holder base of an asset increases (more captured, more in the system), our fiat overlords are more incentivized to pump its fiat-denominated price.

( This is of course an oversimplification. )

If Bitcoin's fiat price pumps, most Bitcoiners will quickly forget that BTC is a captured asset, so you usually get fiat gains as a gift for being a good, little goy.

In another post, I'll cover how I got lucky and sold 85% of my BTC at 113K and the remaining 15% at 95K. (Basically my opinion on why the Bitcoin cycle exists)

I'd only use Bitcoin for speculating (trying to mine fiat), and as of now, I'm staying away because I don't think that the incoming Quantum scam is priced in ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).

Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know ...

2026-05-07T04:46:03Z

Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know viruses exist?

Mr Scientist: Trust the science, mr. Goy.

Viruses don't exist which means your government has been trying to maim/kill you, your family and your pets/cattle with vaccines for a very long time.

It also means we've been living under a One World Government for a very long time.

Will the Indians finally isolate a virus?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J52m2lHyVNE

Dr. Tom Cowan does a great job of summarizing why viruses don't exist in this video.

https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as ...

2026-04-29T08:44:47Z

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂

But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂

They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible.

The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games.

Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God.

Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future.

The test is simple:
- Can you say "God says no" and still live?

The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.

If the seed is already good, then bad on-box RNG is mostly ...

2026-04-17T13:34:39Z

In reply to nevent1q…gp3u
_________________________

If the seed is already good, then bad on-box RNG is mostly sidestepped for address generation.

But if you literally pull BIP39 words from a bag, that is not the clean BIP39 model.

BIP39 says the mnemonic is meant to transport generated entropy, not to process user-created sentences, and the mnemonic includes checksum structure.

You can generate raw entropy off-computer, then let the offline tool convert that entropy into a valid mnemonic/checksum.

A truly random off-box seed makes you safer against compromised RNG, but it does not make the setup trustworthy unless you also solve independent verification.

You can still get compromised with address substitution at receive time, and later spending is a separate danger zone (a compromised signer can leak through nonce selection), etc.

And air-gapped only blocks ordinary network exfiltration. It does not stop a compromised box from storing secrets locally for later extraction.

So the minimum hardening move is:
- generate raw entropy off-box,
- derive the wallet on one offline machine,
- then verify the first several receive addresses on a second independent offline implementation from the same seed/path/passphrase,
- and record the descriptor/script type/derivation path/passphrase separately.

Then you know two different stacks reproduced the same addresses from the same secret.

External entropy neutralizes one class of failure - predictable seed generation. It does not neutralize the more important class - a compromised machine lying to you or copying your secrets.

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a ...

2026-04-17T08:57:22Z

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a threat than Quantum computing.

There is zero credible evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful, and yet most of the attention is focused on Quantum and not the very likely case that most of the main hardware wallets are backdoored.

This video is great:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCKq9u-AL0A

If you spend some time doing objective research, you'll likely come to the conclusion that there is no neat solution that makes you "immune to the NSA". The best you can do is:
- Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
- Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.

The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:
- Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
- Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
- Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
- Independent stacks for different key shares.

A state-level actor can plausibly:
- backdoor RNG/nonces,
- exfil keys via signatures,
- coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
- intercept shipping,
- or just use host+legal leverage.

There are very many attack vectors and in some places, you just have to trust as you can't verify.

Some of the attack vectors:
- Closed-source secure elements with opaque behavior.
- Compromised RNG -> predictable keys.
- Firmware "updates" that:
(a) leak shards,
(b) weaken PIN delays,
(c) selectively target flagged serials.

- Supply chain substitution:
(a) devices swapped in transit,
(b) chips with additional logic embedded.

If we assume Controller-grade adversaries and cooperation leverage over:
- silicon vendors,
- big wallet brands,
- customs/parcel systems,
then for mass-market users:
- "self-custody" often means: "I'm holding a compromised device that behaves like self-custody until it's politically useful to make it misbehave."

And of course, they don't need 100% coverage. If they can de-risk 80-90% of "self-custody" BTC/Monero via:
- hardware design,
- vendor pressure,
- update channels,
then most people hold just another pool of conditionally controllable assets.

Even if they never fully exploit it, the option exists.

If you think hardware wallets being compromised is a bit of a stretch, maybe look into Dual_EC_DRBG, operation Bullrun, Edgehill, the company Crypto AG, operation Rubicon, etc.

Who knows what sorts of stuff people like Adam Back and co are up to.

quoting
nevent1q…63cs
All you can do is try to save yourself and your loved ones. Most people will get rekt. That's just how it always goes.

Many of the people who are preparing are misguided as well.

At this point, I think we have to assume that most Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are backdoored.

Instead of focusing how we can ensure at least some of the main hardware wallets are not backdoored (which to my knowledge, we can't), we are focusing on how to migrate to government-selected post-quantum scam algorithms and whose coins to freeze.

Most people never learn.

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending ...

2026-04-17T03:33:33Z

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up.

After the reset:
- the petrodollar falls,
- Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs,
- CBDCs are the day-to-day money,
- and almost everything else is a revocable license.

So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

Nostr event nevent1qqsg30tsu4xpncm5wdhayksu5azptl7gcatu0s7p427qw2jqnm7u8zczyqckazld8jvvsamppq7qa6nx950w6d4c4gvur3lq9taglj9t5qzv5kqe7zt

2026-04-10T15:04:24Z

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", ...

2026-03-14T09:08:00Z

If the name of a company contains the words "truth", "honesty", "transparency", "safety", etc., you can be almost certain it's a scam.

Shout-out to "truth social" 😂

Inversion is the core operating pattern for modern control systems.

Inversion = when the label and the function trade places.
- "Freedom" rails used to tighten control.
- "Safety" doctrines used to centralize risk.
- "Decentralized" tools pinned to centralized choke-points.
- "Protection of property rights" used to rewrite who owns what.
- "Transparency" means: you are transparent; the system is not.

Blunt tools:
- naked expropriation,
- open censorship,
- outright bans,
- top-down classification,
... all burn legitimacy and trigger resistance.

Inversion is cheaper:

1) It piggybacks on real desires:
- "Protect my kids."
- "Prevent the next 2008."
- "Save the planet."
- "Give me better UX."

2) It lets the Controllers pose as:
- protectors,
- technocratic fixers,
- responsible adults
…while the actual consequence is: tighter rails, fewer exits, more programmable constraints.

3) It's self-enforcing:
- people defend the inverted rail because they're attached to the original value word.

If you attack the rail, most people hear "you hate safety / fairness / the planet / children".

So inversion is not decorative; it's the main way to turn:
- legitimate needs -> high-acceptance control systems.

Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been ...

2026-03-13T08:43:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…lvnf
_________________________

Well, your lived experience, just like mine, is that we have been brainwashed from the day we were born.

My assertion is that no virus exists, not that just Covid doesn't exist.

1) https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

2) https://www.bitchute.com/video/pWcHXqLDVvYL

3) https://www.bitchute.com/video/URcvRFVibHJF

No virus has ever been isolated. Vaccines are used to depopulate.

Your cousin got sick of something (doesn't mean it was Covid), even if she had a positive Covid test.

Falsification is independent of replacement and the burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim.

In other words, if you say that Covid exists, you ought to isolate the virus and prove it and so far no virus has ever been isolated as shown in the 2 documentaries above.

You can't conclude that your cousin was sick from Covid just because she was sick.

In regards to nuclear weapons, I wrote that there is no evidence that anyone has ever split an atom and nuclear weapons as advertised exist. That doesn't mean that very powerful bombs don't exist.

1) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6oGXzXz6yQ

The podcast I've linked to above has all of the receipts. There is no evidence that an atom has ever been split.

There was a study published in The Journal of the American Medical Association in 1990. The 40-year study of thousands of Japanese who survived the "atomic bombs" dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki found radiation exposure did not cause genetic damage that could lead to human mutations.

"intense study of 70,000 offspring of atomic bomb survivors has failed to identify an increase in congential abnormalities, cancer, chromosome aberrations or mutational blood protein changes."

All of the receipts are in the podcast I've linked to (peer-reviewed scientific journals).

The Japanese people likely got firebombed.

"It is an established fact that napalm chemical firebombing of wooden Japanese cities was extremely destructive. In May 1945, Tokyo was hit with incendiary payloads from 334 B-29 Superfortresses, burning 16 square miles and destroying more than half of the city. The Hiroshima operation involved 4 sq. miles. Using the Tokyo ratio, it could have been achieved with 83 planes.

Hiroshima was a wooden shantytown constructed in a concentrated area. It was a sitting duck for a carefully crafted firebombing terror attack with an atomic-bomb psyop added on for full effect."

There are literally pictures of concrete buildings that survived a ground zero atomic blast. Hiroshima looks carpet-bombed.

I'd focus more on the "viruses don't exist" part because very many people poison themselves and their loved ones with vaccines.

Whether somebody gets bombed with an "atomic bomb" or gets fire-bombed, the end result is likely the same.

Very interesting post from a guy named Bob Kendall on twitter. ( ...

2026-02-05T03:09:20Z

Very interesting post from a guy named Bob Kendall on twitter.

( https://x.com/PortfolioXpert/status/2019180840958529601 )

First the TL;DR of his tweet:
* Bitcoin price discovery shifted from onchain supply to synthetic float
* Financial derivatives created a theoretically infinite supply of Bitcoin
* Synthetic manufacturing of supply eliminated asset scarcity
* Institutions use paper inventory to manipulate price movements
* Bitcoin now functions as a fractional reserve price system

And here is Bob Kendall's original tweet:

So here’s the issue you get influencers like this guy have a quarter million followers and they claim they don’t know why it is declining… it’s because they don’t understand basic mechanics of price discovery.

They don’t understand that the marginal buyers or the float determines price they think the onchain bitcoin is that is the price discovery

Well, it was once upon a time but now..

Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.

This is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.

This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.

The original premise that no longer exists

Bitcoin’s entire valuation logic was built on finite supply (21M) and inability to be rehypothecated.

That died the moment:
•Cash-settled futures
•Perpetual swaps
•Options
•ETFs
•Prime broker lending
•Wrapped BTC
•Total return swaps

were layered on top of the chain.

From that moment forward:

Bitcoin supply became theoretically infinite.

Not on-chain in price discovery.

The metric that explains the collapse

Synthetic Float Ratio (SFR)

Once you can synthetically manufacture the supply, the asset is no longer scarce — and once scarcity is gone, price becomes a derivatives game, not a supply-and-demand market.

That is exactly what has happened to Bitcoin.

This is the same structural break that occurred in gold, silver, oil, and eventually equities once they became derivatives-dominated.

Why Wall Street can now “trade against” Bitcoin

They do exactly what they’ve done in every commodity market:
1.Create unlimited paper BTC
2.Short into rallies
3.Force liquidations
4.Cover lower
5.Repeat

They are not “betting” — they are manufacturing inventory.

The same 1 BTC can now support:
•An ETF unit
•A futures contract
•A perpetual swap
•An options delta
•A broker loan
•A structured note

All at once.

That is six claims on one coin.

That is not a market.
That is a fractional reserve price system.

----------------------------------------------

I have written about this in my "Why Bitcoin's 21M cap is not guaranteed (Paper Bitcoin)" article:
- https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-bitcoins-21m-cap-is-not-guaranteed

Even though I'm not very bullish on Bitcoin's fiat price short-term, I am starting to DCA into self-custody at these prices because something with the financial system seems very off. I'd rather take a drawdown on an asset I own than get bailed-in and get wrecked.

Imagine having the ability to print too much money, hook everyone ...

2026-01-24T11:18:55Z

Imagine having the ability to print too much money, hook everyone on cheap credit, cause inflation, and then stop printing because of inflation, cause a crisis, and rug-pull everyone because there isn't enough money in the system to service the debt.

We've had this on repeat in almost every country, decade after decade, and we keep playing this game we can never win.

Humans are kinda retarded to be honest.

And for the role of the Fed's chair they always cast some old guy, or some old lady because old people would never fuck you over.

And meanwhile Jerome Powell is going to parties with Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, Mitt Romney, and all of the other vampires. Shiiiiiiiiiiet.

quoting
nevent1q…25mt
Once you start to research the financial system, it really humbles you.

You have to start questioning everything you think you know.

The official narrative story often diverges from reality.

For example, the real cycle is Debt/Liquidity, not Debt/GDP.

Almost every "crisis" is: not enough liquidity, at the right points in the plumbing, to roll the existing debt at a politically tolerable price.

- "Too much liquidity vs debt" → bubbles.
- "Too much debt vs liquidity" → refinancing crisis.

In other words, they inflate the currency at will and rug-pull at will.

Richard Werner did a good job of illustrating this with his book and documentary "Princes of the Yen" ( https://odysee.com/@Reachthedivine:d/Princes-of-the-Yen---The-Hidden-Power-of-Central-Banks_fixed-2014:e ), where he documents how the banking cartel allowed Japanese, South Koreans, etc, to lever up with credit (caused inflation), then intentionally pulled liquidity and rug-pulled everyone into a depression.

Think of the global system as a giant refinancing conveyor belt:
- The belt carries maturing obligations (bonds, loans, repos, margin).
- The operators can spray liquidity foam (reserves, facilities, swap lines, fiscal deficits, regulatory relief) to keep things rolling.
- If they over-spray, everything slides too easily → bubbles.
- If they under-spray, some pile of debt sticks, catches fire, and they have to choose who burns.

Debt/Liquidity = how well that belt runs at any given time.

Debt/GDP is the fake, official narrative story (it is stock vs flow), whereas Debt/Liquidity is about timing and plumbing.

Every financial crisis is basically a roll failure (not enough liquidity to roll the existing debt at tolerable prices).

They can under-inject liquidity by however much they want, whenever they want, to rug-pull whoever they want and bail out whoever they want.

Each Debt/Liquidity cycle is another Hegelian loop:
- Problem: refi wall + under-injection of liquidity → crisis.
- Reaction: fear, political pressure.
- Solution: more centralized rails (CBDCs, ID, Palantir-style governance OS, tighter collateral rules).

We're basically playing a game we can't win and have been for a very long time.

If you think in Debt/Liquidity terms, "macro" stops being a blur and becomes a timing overlay on top of a very stable structural direction: more debt, more crises, more patches, more rails.

Michael Howell does a good job of illustrating the Debt/Liquidity relationship with this chart.

- "Too much liquidity vs debt" → bubbles.
- "Too much debt vs liquidity" → refinancing crisis.

Very strange that I'm unable to zap you but able to zap ...

2025-11-29T07:41:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…fmtj
_________________________

Very strange that I'm unable to zap you but able to zap others, and you zapped me so I assume your wallet is connected.

I use Primal, what app/wallet do you use?

What made me sell most of my Bitcoin a few months ago ...

2025-11-25T05:04:30Z

What made me sell most of my Bitcoin a few months ago

https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin

My goal with this Substack was to open-source most of my Bitcoin research and with this article, I have achieved my goal.

It's wild that you can learn more about investing from Aldous ...

2025-10-20T11:27:16Z

It's wild that you can learn more about investing from Aldous Huxley than from any of these chumps who follow Powell's every move and record 1 hour podcasts analyzing his body language.

For example, this quote is great.

What Huxley is saying:

- “Abnormally normal” = perfectly compliant to a sick environment.
If a society’s core incentives reward obedience, consumption, and performative virtue over truth and agency, then adjustment is a pathology: you’re healthy-for-the-system, not healthy-for-yourself.

- Silenced “human voice” = the self that resists harmful incentives.
The child’s curiosity, refusal to lie, intolerance for double standards - trained out early via schooling, media norms, and micro-rewards/punishments until dissent feels wrong.

- No symptoms = no alarms.
The “neurotic” at least shows friction with false incentives; the “normal” runs without error messages. That’s efficient for rulers and lethal for authenticity.

Huxley’s core insight isn’t “future dystopia”, it’s cost curves: pleasure is a cheaper control input than pain, defaults govern better than laws, and language (“safety”, “stability”, “community”) edits reality. If you track incentives, defaults, and word swaps - not ideals - you’ll predict human behavior with embarrassing accuracy.

How governments and large institutions are domesticating Bitcoin: ...

2025-09-12T05:06:48Z

How governments and large institutions are domesticating Bitcoin:

- allow price exposure in surveilled wrappers,
- throttle sovereign self-custody at scale,
- and pin price discovery to venues they can supervise.

Let's look at the definitive signal list of State, corporate, and market-structure tells that add up to containment (not prohibition, not capitulation).

There will be signs (and there are).

A) Law, Regulation, and Supervision

1) KYC/AML hardening (Travel Rule everywhere). Mandates to identify senders/recipients across VASPs (Virtual Asset Service Provider); private transfers face added friction or are discouraged.

To simplify this if you don't know what the Travel Rule is, here is how it plays out:

Exchange -> exchange (VASP -> VASP):

Example: Kraken -> Coinbase. Coinbase is the receiving company. Kraken must transmit originator/beneficiary details (name, account/wallet identifiers, etc.), typically in the IVMS-101 format.

Exchange -> self-hosted wallet:

There's no receiving company (no VASP on the other side), so no counter-party to send data to. In the EU, the sending VASP must still collect info, and for transfers over €1,000 it must verify ownership of that self-hosted address (e.g., message signing).

Self-hosted wallet -> exchange:

The exchange you deposit to is the receiving company. It must obtain required info before/when crediting the funds and may ask you to prove you control the sending address.

2) "Mixer" criminalization/designation. Sanctions and special-measure rules against mixing/tumbling tools and related infrastructure; chilling effect on privacy tooling.

3) Licensing regimes that raise fixed costs. BitLicense-style authorizations; EU MiCA CASP licensing; UK/FCA registration - each converts compliance into a barrier to entry and increases gatekeeper leverage.

4) Broker-style tax reporting. Expansion of standardized gain/loss reporting (e.g., 1099-type forms), pushing exposure into surveilled intermediaries and making day-to-day spend onerous.

5) No de-minimis relief for payments. Everyday Bitcoin spending remains a taxable disposal (no small-purchase exemption), suppressing medium-of-exchange usage.

6) High prudential capital charges for banks. Unbacked Bitcoin exposures given punitive risk weights under bank rules, discouraging balance-sheet adoption and reserve use.

7) Sanctions reach extended to addresses/tools. OFAC-style designations of specific wallets/services; exchanges obliged to screen and freeze - normalizes address-level policing.

8) Advertising/marketing restrictions. Tightened rules on retail promotion; approvals required; compliant phrasing only - slows "organic" adoption.

9) Court acceptance of chain-surveillance evidence. Judicial normalization of on-chain heuristics (taint analysis) increases enforcement confidence and deters privacy use.

B) Market-Structure & Pricing Control

10) Spot ETFs approved; self-custody not scaled. Mass exposure routed into custodial funds with APs/market-makers under surveillance; retail "ownership" = brokerage claims, not keys.

11) Cash-settled futures hegemony (regulated venues). Institutional hedging and basis trades centered on supervised derivatives (e.g., CME), letting paper supply influence marginal price.

12) Custody concentration. A small set of brand-name custodians and a narrow AP set - choke points where policy can act without touching every holder.

13) Index-committee discretion against Bitcoin proxies. Flagship equity indices can exclude corporates that function as Bitcoin trackers (protect index optics; avoid importing crypto beta).

- S&P declined MSTR entry, even though the company meets the requirements. NASDAQ/QQQ inclusion is rules-based which allowed MSTR in (for now). My best guess is that the rules change and MSTR gets kicked out eventually, but this is just speculation.

14) Prime brokerage / funding dependence. Leverage and borrow routed through supervised lenders; stress events are resolved in ways that prioritize systemic stability over "code is law".

15) Stablecoin preference for transactional rails. Policymakers elevate fiat-pegged coins (with issuer KYC/redeem controls) as the "digital cash" path, crowding out Bitcoin as a payments rail.

C) Platform, Standards, and Default Settings

16) App-store / OS policy throttles. Wallet and node apps constrained by ToS (background processes, payment rails, external links), keeping users inside monitored ecosystems.

17) Exchange surveillance integrations. Mandatory chain-analysis (TRM/Chainalysis/Elliptic) as a license condition; withdrawal heuristics trigger holds or questionnaires.

18) Bank/payment "de-risking". Episodic account closures, rolling KBA (knowledge-based auth) challenges, and heightened SAR (Suspicious Activity Report) filing - keeps fiat on/off-ramps scarce and cautious.

19) Standards -> law copy-paste. FATF guidance and regional templates propagate globally; once a control is codified in one bloc, others replicate the same wording.

20) Compliance by SDK/API. Travel-rule messaging, address-screening, and risk scoring embedded in vendor SDKs - containment becomes the default implementation.

21) Identity-bound wallets. Movement toward government-approved digital ID tying KYC attributes to wallets - programmable compliance at the wallet-permission layer.

D) Tax, Accounting, and Corporate Policy Signals

22) Fair-value accounting = optical profits; policy still resists. New accounting lets Bitcoin marks hit earnings, but committees/boards still avoid Bitcoin balance-sheet strategies (volatility + optics + procurement risk).

23) Treasury/board guidelines against macro-speculation. Corporate policies codify "no non-operating macro bets", pushing Bitcoin exposure -if any - into ETF shares, not keys.

24) Insurance & audit gating. D&O/cyber insurance, auditors, and lenders attach covenants or exclusions when Bitcoin exposure is outside well-worn wrappers.

E) CBDC/Identity Build-Out (the strategic substitute)

25) CBDC pilots tied to digital ID and programmable controls. The preferred digitization path is controllable money with ledger-level policy hooks.

26) Merchant QR/soft-POS rails hardened around KYC'd accounts. New payment rails ship with identity and risk controls by default - Bitcoin remains "other".

27) Crisis playbooks tested. Emergency alerting, "essential commerce" allow-lists, and granular merchant categories - primitives for programmable payments at scale.

F) Soft Power: Narrative & Optics

28) Environmental and consumer-risk frames. Sustained messaging that miners "waste energy" or that self-custody is "unsafe for consumers" - used to justify new controls.

29) "Innovation, responsibly" rhetoric. Politically safe posture: bless ETFs/enterprise chain-analytics while sidelining the monetary-sovereignty use case.

30) Hero projects elsewhere. Official enthusiasm channeled to AI, quantum, chips - areas with easier control knobs - signaling where capital and regulatory patience will go.

G) "Absence" Signals (what you never see)

31) No legal carve-outs for small Bitcoin payments. A lasting omission that tells you payments isn't the intended role.

32) No HQLA-style treatment for Bitcoin. Banks are not allowed to count Bitcoin toward high-quality liquid assets.

33) No sovereign reserve disclosures (outside of stolen Bitcoin). If a major central bank/sovereign wealth fund wanted Bitcoin reserve signaling, you’d see it; you don't.

34) No mass-market self-custody education from public institutions. Education focuses on fraud avoidance and ETF literacy, not key management.

H) Second-Order “Pen” Effects

35) ETF-first adoption curve. Households "own Bitcoin" via retirement accounts/brokerage ETFs - behaviorally entrenches custodial dependence.

36) Price discovery anchored where toggles exist. During stress, derivatives and ETF flows dominate; spot self-custody has less marginal impact.

37) Talent and vendor gravity. Startups build to compliance SDKs and custodial APIs; few build UX-clean self-custody for the masses - market follows the money.

38) Jurisdiction shopping ends at the fiat door. Even if an exchange is permissive, fiat banking sits under Basel/FATF; rails re-impose containment at the edge.

Now, let's look at the Falsifiers (Bitcoin escape conditions) that would make this entire post incorrect:

1) G-7/major SWF (Sovereign Wealth Fund) discloses even 1–2% Bitcoin reserves/collateral (not stolen, but bought). In other words, big governments start purchasing Bitcoin.

2) De-minimis tax relief for Bitcoin payments in multiple big economies.

3) Banks get permissive risk weights or HQLA-like treatment for Bitcoin.

4) Non-custodial wallets become ID-neutral by default in major app stores/payment ecosystems.

quoting
nevent1q…ad5u
Had a quick look at Bitcoin twitter the other day and it is shocking how clueless most Bitcoiners (even OGs) are.

They fail to understand simple concepts and incentives, or at least pretend to not understand them.

Here are some of the things most fail to understand:

1. Confusing permissionless tech with permissionless adoption ( permissionless technology ≠ permissionless adoption).

- The system controls rails, not code; adoption is steered by defaults, custody concentration, and tax/reporting.

- Separate tech truth (permissionless, scarce, global) from adoption truth (defaults, rails, policy).

2. Ignoring revealed preferences.

- States repeatedly choose ring-fencing (ETFs, KYC, custody oligopolies) over Strategic reserve adoption. No G7 state is buying Bitcoin to pump your bags (they may steal it though), so stop begging 😂

3. Assuming "co-opt the State"

- In reality, the State co-opts Bitcoin by financializing price exposure while starving sovereign usage at scale.

- When I listen to Bitcoiners talk about how "Governments are so stupid and don't understand Bitcoin, but they'll understand it eventually", I have to laugh. These people might actually have a mental disability.

4. You can't enforce SoV (the 21 million cap) by not holding your coins, by investing in Bitcoin ETFs (remember GLD?), and by not asking treasury companies for Proof-of-Reserves, etc.

And I am not saying that you won't get incredibly rich by buying Bitcoin.

If you invested in gold in its infancy, you still got incredibly rich even with the State co-opting it.

What I am saying is that most Bitcoiners are buying Gold, while thinking they're buying Bitcoin.

In other words, digital gold for most, money for a few.

Again, the State's dominant strategy is containment, not capitulation (nor killing Bitcoin). Bitcoin will be tolerated as financial exposure (in surveilled wrappers) and as a self-custody tail hedge for individuals - but not as a parallel monetary base.

I have to write more about the Travel Rule / KYC hardening, etc, because the State has clearly shown its cards, but most Bitcoiners listen to words coming from charismatic politicians instead of looking at the actions of the string-pullers.

This has been a tough pill to swallow for me as well 😂, but burying my head in the sand is not an option for me. Mental weakness is not an option.

Had a quick look at Bitcoin twitter the other day and it is ...

2025-09-12T03:27:39Z

Had a quick look at Bitcoin twitter the other day and it is shocking how clueless most Bitcoiners (even OGs) are.

They fail to understand simple concepts and incentives, or at least pretend to not understand them.

Here are some of the things most fail to understand:

1. Confusing permissionless tech with permissionless adoption ( permissionless technology ≠ permissionless adoption).

- The system controls rails, not code; adoption is steered by defaults, custody concentration, and tax/reporting.

- Separate tech truth (permissionless, scarce, global) from adoption truth (defaults, rails, policy).

2. Ignoring revealed preferences.

- States repeatedly choose ring-fencing (ETFs, KYC, custody oligopolies) over Strategic reserve adoption. No G7 state is buying Bitcoin to pump your bags (they may steal it though), so stop begging 😂

3. Assuming "co-opt the State"

- In reality, the State co-opts Bitcoin by financializing price exposure while starving sovereign usage at scale.

- When I listen to Bitcoiners talk about how "Governments are so stupid and don't understand Bitcoin, but they'll understand it eventually", I have to laugh. These people might actually have a mental disability.

4. You can't enforce SoV (the 21 million cap) by not holding your coins, by investing in Bitcoin ETFs (remember GLD?), and by not asking treasury companies for Proof-of-Reserves, etc.

And I am not saying that you won't get incredibly rich by buying Bitcoin.

If you invested in gold in its infancy, you still got incredibly rich even with the State co-opting it.

What I am saying is that most Bitcoiners are buying Gold, while thinking they're buying Bitcoin.

In other words, digital gold for most, money for a few.

Again, the State's dominant strategy is containment, not capitulation (nor killing Bitcoin). Bitcoin will be tolerated as financial exposure (in surveilled wrappers) and as a self-custody tail hedge for individuals - but not as a parallel monetary base.

I have to write more about the Travel Rule / KYC hardening, etc, because the State has clearly shown its cards, but most Bitcoiners listen to words coming from charismatic politicians instead of looking at the actions of the string-pullers.

This has been a tough pill to swallow for me as well 😂, but burying my head in the sand is not an option for me. Mental weakness is not an option.