<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-10-27T14:14:54Z</updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.now</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by Dave Wilburn :donor:</title>
  <author>
    <name>Dave Wilburn :donor:</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.now/npub1wdxuezc5l30800yurf2qezl6ygftpxhmerte38chm4jwt7c5nndsqegg3t.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.now/npub1wdxuezc5l30800yurf2qezl6ygftpxhmerte38chm4jwt7c5nndsqegg3t" />
  <id>https://nostr.now/npub1wdxuezc5l30800yurf2qezl6ygftpxhmerte38chm4jwt7c5nndsqegg3t</id>
  <icon>https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/109/350/399/117/514/399/original/133fef8162b77e51.jpg</icon>
  <logo>https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/109/350/399/117/514/399/original/133fef8162b77e51.jpg</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqv900u9qssk4a6dlww9cy8jlflzkgzkcnmdpxduklyela4t7p7sgzype5mnytzn79uaaunsd9grytlg3p9vy6l0yd0xylzlwkfe0mzjwdk44k9vv</id>
    
      <title type="html">Yep, looks like horizontal rules are unsupported. Headings ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqv900u9qssk4a6dlww9cy8jlflzkgzkcnmdpxduklyela4t7p7sgzype5mnytzn79uaaunsd9grytlg3p9vy6l0yd0xylzlwkfe0mzjwdk44k9vv" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqstxp20skk4c7hrv4srz3lg64t4923n6c99jk03v3spqvct665yxnch34gql&#39;&gt;nevent1q…4gql&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Yep, looks like horizontal rules are unsupported. Headings don&amp;#39;t work either. Subscripts and superscripts appear defective.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Or maybe I just don&amp;#39;t know what I&amp;#39;m doing.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-12T18:14:17Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsdyv60nmaf0fjd8rvslqqpvy69lymhc37acmue0z6hqzyszd5sw9szype5mnytzn79uaaunsd9grytlg3p9vy6l0yd0xylzlwkfe0mzjwdkdqjzp3</id>
    
      <title type="html">I&amp;#39;m gonna push back on this a little bit. I don&amp;#39;t think ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsdyv60nmaf0fjd8rvslqqpvy69lymhc37acmue0z6hqzyszd5sw9szype5mnytzn79uaaunsd9grytlg3p9vy6l0yd0xylzlwkfe0mzjwdkdqjzp3" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqspeutln3jd0e7w87fsteegtt2nscryuk9vl2jp4gt0plcmcu42szcsvcfcf&#39;&gt;nevent1q…cfcf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&amp;#39;m gonna push back on this a little bit. I don&amp;#39;t think it&amp;#39;s just the individual employees of infosec companies that are deeply invested in sharing timely CTI for the public good. In many (but certainly not all) cases, that includes most of their management chain up to and including the founders.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Does public sharing too often take a back seat to revenue (and yes, even non-profits need revenue because people gotta eat)? Is it unfortunate that public vendor reporting is often out of the marketing department rather than their technical ops? Do things rapidly go off the rails when private equity and major acquisitions get involved? Is there often too much obsession over secrecy and agonizing over intel gain/loss decision making resulting from government influence over infosec culture? Yes to all of the above. But a lot of infosec vendor teams are still out there doing some damn fine work, and we should congratulate them on their hard work when we see it.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Finally, if what you want is for folks to do the right thing by sharing more, then maybe don&amp;#39;t interject with criticism when they&amp;#39;re modeling something close to that behavior. There&amp;#39;s a time and a place for valid criticism, but publicly excoriating someone when they&amp;#39;re trying to do the right thing and feeling pretty good about it is just disincentivizing the right behavior.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-06-18T15:18:59Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>