Nostr notes by NoDoxGregBrady

I was thinking about the 1990's a couple weeks back; weird ...

2026-09-11T13:13:53Z

I was thinking about the 1990's a couple weeks back; weird time to be alive.

The 80's were something else in that they were the recovery from the operation. The jew took over the entire West and changed every facet of our culture, and nobody fought back and killed them for it.

So they spent a whole decade celebrating how fucking awesome they were.

Then the party stopped. That was the 90's. Nothing really unusual.... except the nonstop Gulf War that's been going strong since August 2, 1990. That's when we got involved over there... openly. The entire "Middle East" has been an active warzone, as per the GAE, for 36 years.

But things didn't really change until 9/11.

Before that, we had our own nation. It was poor (irl), but it was still ours.

After that, we were just an occupied nation beaten by a hostile enemy who hates us and wants us dead.

Another 36 year timeframe was 1965 (when the jew confirmed governmental power) to 2001.

Another 36 year timeframe was 1929 (the stock-market crash that started the Great Depression) to 1965.

Another 36 year timeframe was the Great Crash of 1893...

I wonder if I just stumbled onto something. Those Satan-worshipping faggots pour great stock into numerology. If it's an unusually coincidental numbers thing, it's not a coincidence.

That would mean the next Big Change wasn't supposed to be until 2037. Maybe their plans are falling apart?

quoting
note12dw…6pg4

That, sir, is a graph showing a line going up over the last ...

2026-09-08T15:23:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…verh
_________________________

That, sir, is a graph showing a line going up over the last single year. It contains no other data.

It definitely does not show "U.S. Birth Rate From 1965-1985".

>@grok please create a graph displaying animosity towards ai ...

2026-09-08T15:20:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…pe02
_________________________

>@grok please create a graph displaying animosity towards ai datacenters over time

>to suggests that having fewer kids than a generation in which ...

2026-09-08T15:17:55Z

In reply to nevent1q…cuhr
_________________________

>to suggests that having fewer kids than a generation in which births "BOOMED" is inherently insufficient is either stupid or dishonest

The. Birthrate. Collapsed.

>by your "logic" (emotion), the corporate standard of ...

2026-09-08T15:14:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…v3jp
_________________________

>by your "logic" (emotion), the corporate standard of "number must always go up" is sensible.

You just proved my assertion. Maintaining the population would have produced a flat line. Not up, not down: flat.

Why are you arguing that the population did not collapse?

>it's just crybaby shit lol LOSER We're currently ...

2026-09-08T15:07:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…gnd5
_________________________

>it's just crybaby shit lol LOSER

We're currently living through an active civilizational collapse. We can all see it (except I guess you). Things have gotten progressively worse for six straight decades.

I cannot believe that you are too stupid to understand that "maintaining the current population" looks different from "declining population", and have to assume you're not arguing in good faith.