<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2025-02-22T14:54:33Z</updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.now</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by kreyszig</title>
  <author>
    <name>kreyszig</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.now/npub1qr95ly0ztlz2ds0lj2nw8m4wsv6aulz0yg2snysddfc9097es4uqrz99p4.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.now/npub1qr95ly0ztlz2ds0lj2nw8m4wsv6aulz0yg2snysddfc9097es4uqrz99p4" />
  <id>https://nostr.now/npub1qr95ly0ztlz2ds0lj2nw8m4wsv6aulz0yg2snysddfc9097es4uqrz99p4</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs8gsjj373sugja0v742tl35kza4fr6uhwxchtm995zunzpwk6x0qqzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhsp2cphv</id>
    
      <title type="html">@nprofile…man7 , any update with @nprofile…2j53 ? Core&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs8gsjj373sugja0v742tl35kza4fr6uhwxchtm995zunzpwk6x0qqzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhsp2cphv" />
    <content type="html">
      &lt;span itemprop=&#34;mentions&#34; itemscope itemtype=&#34;https://schema.org/Person&#34;&gt;&lt;a itemprop=&#34;url&#34; href=&#34;/nprofile1qqs8k0mcqd6sw3h524qn5gslszt9am9knmes3uh268dgnnpv3yfwj6qpzamhxue69uhky6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy08wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yttsw43zuam9d3kx7unyv4ezumn9wshs8qman7&#34; class=&#34;bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;jimmysong&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class=&#34;italic&#34;&gt;nprofile…man7&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  , any update with &lt;span itemprop=&#34;mentions&#34; itemscope itemtype=&#34;https://schema.org/Person&#34;&gt;&lt;a itemprop=&#34;url&#34; href=&#34;/nprofile1qqsvasuvv4gz4y5snftz0x9cd43308pwjg68nmcdzg5n7zftc7khe4spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46z7qgjwaehxw309ahx7um5wfshxtnpwpcz7qg4waehxw309ahx7um5wghx77r5wghxgetk9ukg2j53&#34; class=&#34;bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;ProductionReady&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class=&#34;italic&#34;&gt;nprofile…2j53&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  ? Core&amp;#39;s oldest maintained branch is getting dangerously close to v30, and many people are still looking for a viable alternative, and saw &lt;span itemprop=&#34;mentions&#34; itemscope itemtype=&#34;https://schema.org/Person&#34;&gt;&lt;a itemprop=&#34;url&#34; href=&#34;/nprofile1qqsvasuvv4gz4y5snftz0x9cd43308pwjg68nmcdzg5n7zftc7khe4spzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnwv46z7qgjwaehxw309ahx7um5wfshxtnpwpcz7qg4waehxw309ahx7um5wghx77r5wghxgetk9ukg2j53&#34; class=&#34;bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;ProductionReady&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class=&#34;italic&#34;&gt;nprofile…2j53&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  as the possibly the best contender, but I have not seen any activity since last March. Is it still in the works? When are you expecting a launch? Thanks!!
    </content>
    <updated>2026-10-29T15:53:38Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsd4dq8etzg4tkmkfmfkmqtc2w0t8r0f9kzal7khnjk7alcufc4nqgzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhsarj88d</id>
    
      <title type="html">I am mostly worried that the risks for the network effects due to ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsd4dq8etzg4tkmkfmfkmqtc2w0t8r0f9kzal7khnjk7alcufc4nqgzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhsarj88d" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsvuwqm4e8p6wq4eeeytkvwvm3asdspljkxx08lzswmseauhet84dspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcratuzt&#39;&gt;nevent1q…tuzt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am mostly worried that the risks for the network effects due to a potential chain split could far outweight the marginal benefits provided by BIP110. As I said I don&amp;#39;t mind the signaling, but not at the cost of damaging the network effect. I would have been much more comfortable to signal if it had not been of the UASF. I would be fine with BIP110 activating with 90% support or failing with 5% support, but I would not like it if it activated with low but significant support.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-07-14T22:12:35Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsts98hslh5k4tqj6aawx60a7dm5elc980mpnhq3te0mwdcfg7ajzszyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhst5nfqd</id>
    
      <title type="html">I don&amp;#39;t like spam, but my understanding is that BIP110 does ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsts98hslh5k4tqj6aawx60a7dm5elc980mpnhq3te0mwdcfg7ajzszyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhst5nfqd" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsyszt3fu5rgkkx4xpzg3mu4fq0hkfd6kqpn4lpw32zhf67fgk3jhspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcx5mwfa&#39;&gt;nevent1q…mwfa&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&amp;#39;t like spam, but my understanding is that BIP110 does not significantly increase the cost of spam (sub 1% for ordinals). I don&amp;#39;t mind the signaling aspect of BIP110 as a way to protest Core, but at this point it seems Core lost any legitimacy and new clients will mostly take over.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-07-14T11:07:54Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqceysunph7cue96qxfcldyapzfr8ct84zsyzyy79d462230k63nqzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhswah3aa</id>
    
      <title type="html">I don&amp;#39;t have a strong view for or against BIP110, but I ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqceysunph7cue96qxfcldyapzfr8ct84zsyzyy79d462230k63nqzyqqvknu3uf0uffkpl7f2dclw46pnthnufu3p2zvjp448q4uhmxzhswah3aa" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqstdny90hcctv8le4n9gp4vdtslmgp8rhwqsfms3ep6unzwsh9kjyspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchslj57xu&#39;&gt;nevent1q…57xu&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I don&amp;#39;t have a strong view for or against BIP110, but I don&amp;#39;t understand this type of statement and I am somewhat worried about the activation mechanism chosen through the UASF.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;If most the nodes weighted by economic relevance and most of the hash power did not signal for BIP110, how could this constitute a contentious hardfork attempt, and why would it be abnormal for BIP110 to fail in this situation?
    </content>
    <updated>2026-07-14T00:24:03Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>