2024-08-18T01:56:49Z https://nostr.now UXI https://nostr.now/npub1ps0wtlvlykrx85evxadtxkr7sn48vx9m2khn5r9qlxzu3grgzpaqr4s7ah https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsgen4sxza830t0fmknsu3wln79p886feulfaqtmj5mfuxltv47ugszyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg85kv5mp0 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs88vz3lw6q73fl67py0zj03vw6fxnn359pvndzes9ch3w2xc0ngqgr07plx'>nevent1q…7plx</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>So it&#39;s better to download from what ? 2026-03-23T17:47:54Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsgvmff3a2dq38mxg8clhe6u44jrp2ez2xrenrsmeq639ycsafrx9szyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg859vyjjj In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsfhkvdant3c7e62j7vwxd9ruknkv6umg8e2ynnnzcmelfvf2cqmzqmhjgtz'>nevent1q…jgtz</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>I agree that financial transaction will likely price out most of the spam in the long term, and block size are static so no storage issue, but the problem isn&#39;t there, the problem is in the UTXO set, which inscription such as ordinal creates multiple non used UTXO which nodes need to keep in RAM (so RAM cost are going significantly higher, so node cost more overtime. So I believe one of the most important things is to remove at the consensus level exploit that permit inscriptions to save UTXO set (which is what BIP-110 is mostly doing) now is BIP-110 the good approach, maybe not but at least its working in the good direction. 2026-02-24T22:54:52Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsrl67c30c40ajsmf7g5ku88pfgjpf0tsyxwvelrkkezy87jhac47szyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg85wpzz8v In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsye2uxv8jqe0arrsyxj6af75jnn87a9mxtjuzg0se4uch2pk3p3zs6rawnq'>nevent1q…awnq</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Agreed that this is not ideal and its a risk on bitcoin stability (assuming the BIP-110 fork is initially a minority chain), but in your opinion, what should we do about UTXO bloat (which is a risk on decentralization) ? 2026-02-23T18:34:53Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs2xwgs083af4alhayddy0wzcexgsfpldgtp2ysmdry9800s3gvqgszyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg85dyps9y In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsq5z24cld2chn8pyftk37a8uhygwfa0x2zc935y42dngfjv32s0vsd2zdq0'>nevent1q…zdq0</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>OK, I see the double spend reorg risk now, that would indeed be bad, but if BIP-110 would initially get accepted by most miners (55% signaling I believe) would you consider that as the ideal scenario ? (Since BIP-110 limits adjustment seams better for the protocol overall) 2026-02-22T18:42:38Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsx354pc03ccxd5uyjt8n65xffreh6evau77zr7upfjwdwkfc6ge0qzyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg854x2smq In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqswxmeggndkn3z3ur2f429pyy03qsq484s5q5dn0xn6fl2klrjkfps95my09'>nevent1q…my09</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>But it will only reverse &#34;invalid&#34; (relative to BIP-110 consensus rules) tx, most likely spam, not normal tx, correct ? 2026-02-22T14:59:04Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsxxds44tpqs0acy2ank60uqdvpep4umy73zn96h3rx7jlw0u0n3rqzyqxpae0anujcvc7n9sm44v6c06zw5aschd267wsv5ructj9qdqg85yeer73 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsfsss066dq20zrs6e09wjqdwlcdnzwe8du4sgu6mjze7ktqtqejtqzeju0g'>nevent1q…ju0g</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Which international airport is the closest ? 2025-11-16T03:05:30Z