2026-10-27T18:40:47Z https://nostr.now ulveon.net (on derg.social) https://nostr.now/npub1mym5dywewm7fcc9cfkm46p6u7vtnwmjlph3wjd7x9fyel62xq7csg0ggxl https://cdn.derg.social/calckey/webpublic-431920b0-64f3-4610-991e-8809bc85f317.png https://cdn.derg.social/calckey/webpublic-431920b0-64f3-4610-991e-8809bc85f317.png https://nostr.now/nevent1qqspnkzy628unrfh7rthxw483uxy6d9k7jrdfvpjvftguuvjsvd9s9qzyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmza52m36 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs9tmf6u5xsz2z9jlfuq8h344qm5cuk636avhnklpsdpcwxel4htxqrnk8np'>nevent1q…k8np</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>and as far as I know Graphene offers extremely comprehensive *security* features including idle reboot for bringing phones to BFU, memory hardening (several types), and exploit protection. These are all security improvements that greatly aid in effectively protecting privacy. <br/><br/>As a matter of fact, and exactly as you mention, you cannot exactly have good privacy guarantees without a comprehensive security baseline, which as you also mention, other distros do not have. LineageOS has many privacy protections but they don&#39;t incorporate the aforementioned GrapheneOS security features and therefore this weakens their privacy offer. <br/><br/>I don&#39;t know, I don&#39;t really see where Tuta egregiously mischaracterised Graphene but admittedly I am also not that well versed in the technical improvements of Graphene over AOSP at a code level (I can understand them conceptually, though). 2026-01-02T22:28:29Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsd0vljsryjfct24v2c2nsy4rkjnnzmnm48rrxg04we40gs88gl2qszyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzzqczs5 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqswrchn08rmdk2dyjhwpd8ddf9yu5p9c3epxak76prnrhpc2r5sd3ga7z2xc'>nevent1q…z2xc</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>in what way did they mislead about Graphene? They mention it&#39;s highly secure, did I miss something? 2026-01-02T21:51:42Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqpth8ghjqdgfsjtw5cl5v20lpmgjkmgey8p5penlyaym2l32tfsczyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzpk70nn In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs8q77d9w94ntxlg9h0ft75jvkn36djends7xa55udh2nzzpll58lg6pl368'>nevent1q…l368</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>soon on Substack: &#34;efficiently building the Torment Nexus using ChatGPT Codex version GPT-6.2 Max, and lessons learned for deploying AI at scale&#34; 2025-12-09T15:51:31Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqqq2z2x0jfuedxrprcnae3fwmha5aqajd2j5smps29gq0eqkm5jgzyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmz3tp9g3 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs0kym6vt7jv6cqxfdqzwvlgyhxutkg709drewquqc6y5cwlz5d74s9ctesq'>nevent1q…tesq</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Isn&#39;t Delta Chat just an email client? E-mail is super leaky and unsafe in terms of metadata especially, much worse than Signal. 2025-11-23T12:37:08Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqszuuu5uznn87l8uxc7u2agtpa36hlu2fagtfw7g6tuhwm4tmfqh5gzyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzsdh8kv <a href="https://sanesecurityguy.com/articles/signal-knows-who-youre-talking-to/">https://sanesecurityguy.com/articles/signal-knows-who-youre-talking-to/</a><br/><br/>What? The ultra safe, mega secure, highly private and totally encrypted chat app is not actually that private?<br/><br/>Damn.<br/><br/>If only someone would have anticipated this <a href="https://ulveon.net/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/">https://ulveon.net/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/</a><br/><br/>&gt;Signal works over the internet, and the internet requires IP (internet protocol) addresses in order to figure out where a message should go. But sending messages over the internet does not require phone numbers; that’s a requirement when using SMS or cellular calls or mobile data, but not for using the internet. And yet, the “privacy-protecting” Signal app requires you to use a phone number to send and receive messages…<br/><br/>&gt;What that leaves us with is a single service that is still a work in progress: SimpleX. It asks for no global identifiers like phone numbers or email addresses. It at least tries, unlike Signal, to make sure that it doesn’t know who’s talking to who. 2025-11-23T11:26:24Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs2rvve6txtje6fl5lumrw9styqqruz07uly485cfnkmt4lk0vng2szyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzjxuts3 In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsfe5a87n0cncz456y8njg35yzc7crqzacm05hqhfy7e7zr4xtqrqq4839kd'>nevent1q…39kd</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Anubis is extremely easy to bypass, you just have to change the User-Agent to not contain Mozilla, please get proper bot protection.<br/><br/><a href="https://ulveon.net/p/2025-08-09-vanguard-part-1-telegram-raid-protection/">https://ulveon.net/p/2025-08-09-vanguard-part-1-telegram-raid-protection/</a><br/><br/>This post talks briefly about other alternatives. Try Berghain, Balooproxy, or go-away. 2025-08-15T20:12:07Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsv69avxgp3a4u00uzqqcujjyltgs435z0daw56gt84s2t582srmnczyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzv7ujpz In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsw4klp74ekhmwrr28xwjx0j82s9vqhhdn29g7sxtwr738zkrzkelcwylfm8'>nevent1q…lfm8</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>e-bikes are amazing, the real problem is reckless cyclists illegally modifying their bikes to go much faster than they&#39;re supposed to. But again, this is on the bike owners, not the bike itself. 2025-07-21T10:40:24Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs286q69jtx6gm6n608vdjxxy93ztu56lrhnvzf4mzjecv7y7m0g4czyrvnw353m9m0e8rqhpxmwhg8tne3wdmwtux796fhcc4yn8lfgcrmzll0v7n In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs2rvn5x4d0fgpmnu52meuh8m27etwn0ughsgzhtmpedkuppxv08ycqaddkv'>nevent1q…ddkv</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Signal has great encryption but is not at all a safe application for all threat models. Threema is much better due to, among other things, not requiring a phone number to use.<br/><br/><a href="https://ulveon.net/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/">https://ulveon.net/p/2025-05-25-effective-security-beyond-encryption/</a> 2025-06-16T21:03:39Z