2023-03-27T13:35:20Z https://nostr.now https://nostr.now/npub1ln8yemng2zx5tk5prpdf4m3acye86qj50s73ssw0zam59zn6gatsmw7hs4 https://static.noagendasocial.com/accounts/avatars/108/982/353/188/375/351/original/ca8f604579619276.jpg https://static.noagendasocial.com/accounts/avatars/108/982/353/188/375/351/original/ca8f604579619276.jpg https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsg2nf3atsslwp8w5azwfpf7qup0q777mzs84k25ke7dnz97ttrmqqzyr7vun8wdpgg63w6syv94xhw8hqnylgz237r6xzpeuthws520fr4wxjyc38 That situation with the New York lawyers is legit. When using chatgpt and asking it to give you anything related to cases, it completely makes up facts even of very popular cases. When you ask it for cases on a particular subject matter, it will give you cases that are completely made up, and it will do it in proper bluebook citation format, so it looks real. These lazy lawyers didn’t verify the cases given to them by chatgpt. <br/><br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/npub167hem6ju6vx27h48n8jauezrfjktmarxnuy5pxx0kt6aufn36apqqy0399" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>npub167hem6ju6vx27h48n8jauezrfjktmarxnuy5pxx0kt6aufn36apqqy0399</span> (<span class="italic">npub167h…0399</span>)</a></span> 2023-09-01T13:48:38Z