2025-07-10T18:16:24Zhttps://nostr.nowNostr notes by TariqTariqhttps://nostr.now/npub1hdjwjeq20wqlr6up9f3fv060uemqmf0haj205vlm6akqpj9dyw8smah4dhhttps://files.mastodon.social/accounts/avatars/109/245/701/933/113/652/original/59f497519e70bf8c.pnghttps://files.mastodon.social/accounts/avatars/109/245/701/933/113/652/original/59f497519e70bf8c.pnghttps://nostr.now/nevent1qqsq8uqt49mk3vw4kt8p7rsverrqmjgnftlrf94v7fwl2je5wne9p2qzyzakf6typfacru0tsy4x993lfln8vrd97lkff73nl0tkcqxg453c7kgn3zwBut google themselves must ship the code to support pixels ...
In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsg20dxa3gguugsm63l8qeeawe736c7sjspru5m5kmdevuwfkzun7gs67cz0'>nevent1q…7cz0</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>But google themselves must ship the code to support pixels themselves...<br/><br/>.. which suggests it isn't cost cutting but a hostile move to make AOSP less useful to 3rd parties, and to make Google's ecosystem more proprietary.<br/><br/>Have I misunderstood something in this reasoning?
2025-06-13T00:49:10Z