2025-08-09T08:48:33Z https://nostr.now TNOV https://nostr.now/npub1h743dcp2vqdy3jjnsesq0ezsjk2e3pveh8camrpwmy0e506nwdyq7c2zzu https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs9kmzz7y3f2j74plldl3cq6ec6azf0us37mc0mjl29chwqw2gu6xqzyzl6k9hq9fsp5jx22wrxqply2z2etxy9nxulrhvv9mv3lx3l2de5sqgnyjp One for us. Regroup now, come back in November. <blockquote class="border-l-05rem border-l-strongpink border-solid"><div class="-ml-4 bg-gradient-to-r from-gray-100 dark:from-zinc-800 to-transparent mr-0 mt-0 mb-4 pl-4 pr-2 py-2">quoting <br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Article"><a itemprop="url" href="/nevent1qqsq03hjm0xuztvv357zkq5tg70uy93c0cdg0vyvdamsfv35yqdtldqvzyllr" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1">nevent1q…yllr</a></span> </div> <br/>CHAT CONTROL 2.0 BLOCKED AGAIN, THANKS TO YOU!<br/><br/>What happened yesterday: the European Parliament blocked the deal pushed by the EU Council.<br/><br/>The EU Council wanted:<br/><br/>(1) "voluntary" scanning of all private chats under "search plans" approved automatically unless an authority vetoes;<br/><br/>(2) administrative authorities, not courts, ordering providers to scan private messages, not limited to suspects, using AI with massive false positive rates;<br/><br/>(3) making the failed Chat Control 1.0 mass scanning regime permanent, while admitting it is not effective, as we discussed in my previous posts.<br/><br/>Your voice to parliamentarians made a huge difference again: the Parliament refused scanning of private communications, stating it must remain limited to persons linked to child sexual abuse, not everyone by default or under a blanket licence, as Council proposed.<br/><br/>The Parliament also closed the back door where "risk mitigation" rules could force providers into scanning under threat of fines.<br/><br/>What did pass: a preliminary agreement on scanning publicly accessible content for known child abuse material. This was proposed by the Parliament as the effective, targeted alternative. But we have doubts about it, keeping in mind how it works in financial laws 🙄<br/><br/>We still wait for the text to see what this means and will inform you in the coming weeks.<br/><br/>And if you think decentralized protocols are exempt, remember that #ChatControl targets service providers. Any #relay or client operating in the #EU could face obligations under this framework.<br/><br/>This defense proves again: our voice matters when it is vocal, with your support!<br/><br/>And we will need it again in November, so please follow the updates.<br/><br/>Now, it is important to call or write to your MEP and your government to say thank you to those who stand on the side of privacy.<br/><br/>They need to see you are watching their move. Please repost.<br/> <img src="https://blossom.primal.net/06c42f7eb8bade53bad9b22b09fa003187d6b4a0dbe716795515420623ccc262.jpg"> </blockquote> 2026-09-30T22:33:04Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsrugmjghl6mq2dy6knarvzhej3rajywc4nvjtjhaknlj4t20wuqzqzyzl6k9hq9fsp5jx22wrxqply2z2etxy9nxulrhvv9mv3lx3l2de5sl49cyv In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsp7tpsqf9uk6xygtpjvusqvqre6zxj8gmwdm2w4pdvpxa68g8ds2sx8luwk'>nevent1q…luwk</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Is there a way to help yourself and disable the ad tech and privacy intruding functions of these devices? 2026-09-09T15:53:14Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs0m644kzwyfh5cd2y9g9zsxrag9ktyp7dw7ylyugphuv2c5vxmzjszyzl6k9hq9fsp5jx22wrxqply2z2etxy9nxulrhvv9mv3lx3l2de5sued30z In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqstumft0pxum430sc2wkchc5dy5ewwexurnfujvemdg9yhynslc8zqp3lgy6'>nevent1q…lgy6</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Siehe die aktuelle causa bei Porsche. Der ehemalige Finanz-/Investmentdude arbeitet dort nicht mehr, bekommt aber noch bis 2030 seine 800.000+ Euro Gehalt. 2026-09-09T13:22:04Z