Nostr notes by Matt Carr

i think the idea may be much simpler. it's still a little bit ...

2026-08-25T01:52:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…fn4u
_________________________

i think the idea may be much simpler. it's still a little bit like a short in the dark, but from my understanding of the argument, it can be well-motivated. if the proof survives the inevitable rigorous review, i think we'll get a much shorter argument (thank god)

it's not possible for me to really comment upon the proof ...

2026-08-24T21:03:39Z

In reply to nevent1q…jeal
_________________________

it's not possible for me to really comment upon the proof itself because it's well outside my expertise, but just from having read parts of it myself, i understand just about as much as alpöge says—that's the snappy punchline of the paper. but it sweeps quite a bit under the rug because the remainder of all 100 or so pages is just about getting to that point.

i'm not sure if this is what you mean or are looking for, but ...

2026-08-19T04:50:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…v6v3
_________________________

i'm not sure if this is what you mean or are looking for, but it is true that that corresponding sequence of gaussian measures converge weak*-ly to the dirac mass, which captures exactly what you say about how physicists might speak of it.