2026-07-29T13:26:52Z https://nostr.now fountainhead https://nostr.now/npub1f6n2pd27gve7fqgkua5n5ssssnmhqnpf2tjg5ae4359dcsuyrm9s89l55f https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsg2xska7nv6yzt3je3wuwf5unywvaghs3l43rs9wgxqxlczdwjexgzyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vk880mht <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqsq9k04vahllseell55m74n3047y88pzlr0z5yany32st29fapqmgspzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5hsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0ulayk6" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>OCEAN</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…ayk6</span>)</a></span> <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqs8fl79rnpsz5x00xmvkvtd8g2u7ve2k2dr3lkfadyy4v24r4k3s4spz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qg4waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t09uea5z4g" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>GrassFedBitcoin</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…5z4g</span>)</a></span> <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqs8ha7ms0mny284ma46xjzf72hel42t74jmtttf3trssfymxyq8ngqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzvuq36amnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwp6kytnhv4kxcmmjv3jhytnwv46qcvjwxr" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>oomahq</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…jwxr</span>)</a></span> <br/><br/>Apologize if this has already been discussed, but, during the BIP110 mandatory signaling period, will Ocean’s back end flip to enforcing? In other words, will the pool still accept non-signaling shares during this period?<br/><br/>Similarly, should there be a resultant chain split, will the pool only mine on the new BIP-110 chain tip? 2026-07-13T15:28:08Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsvzxm527mnrch88vm78vqzd36u3t05nzmpxjmwgpfktya3e2ycg0szyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vke54ahq In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs0gwsf0wn9x864xzt6cktzegangfn99gvah0f03tmhaplk4f60yesehvlus'>nevent1q…vlus</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>pumpkin pie… 2026-05-22T01:13:32Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsf2zrq68tc8cwdg2sp5sqe4hprd63vtmcx55pw4696ajuk6c4zc9gzyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vk2smxkh In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs8lphp09266wd07xh0839w3d0qt2pr55x2m6fs2773q5qk0utzpcspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerfw36x7tnsw43z7ca6uh4'>nevent1q…6uh4</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>Certainly not arguing the side of on chain zaps, but isn’t the picture you painted more of an ‘address reuse’ issue than a ‘on chain zap’ specific issue? 2026-05-21T01:23:53Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqst4p68x7rqjtlgkt64mfvg4e3q6hs34stl4fcts5gzj58n7ypk96czyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vk2nyljy In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqsy79ewpyyurszqh2gc5m7c78k0quld33jlqjtmsndce939p9crxvqt3lkez'>nevent1q…lkez</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqst5teefqektpr4aytgpwyclxlq78v9q9nvd2pem0sgf5pxdttwyzspydmhxue69uhk66rsxg6ns7njwp5kjamw9e3kcmmjv43kcmm4vshxuet59uq3kamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7fwd45kuern9e3k7mf0dehhxarj8lsfud" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>Danielprince</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…sfud</span>)</a></span> <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/npub100mahqlhxg50thmt5dyynu40nl25hat9kkkknzk8pqjfkvgq0xsqtdfyy5" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>oomahq</span> (<span class="italic">npub100m…fyy5</span>)</a></span> <br/><br/>I really like the idea of this and am currently spinning up a new/separate pruned knots node to test it out. <br/><br/>There’s been a lot of talk or inferring about the advantages of this with regard to getting clean non KYC’d sats. I totally get that from a ‘mining’ perspective in general, but, unless you rent the hash from Braiins using non KYC’d sats to begin with, aren’t you essentially KYC’ing all sats associated with your payout address?<br/><br/><span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqsggcc8dz9qnmq399n7kp2yu79fazxy3ag8ztpea4y3lu4klgqe46qpzamhxue69uhhx6r4xq6juumgw4nh2u3wdejhgtcpypmhxue69uhkc6tzwfjhyetvv9ujuctpwfhku6t4d45kjtnrdakj7kdswak" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>BitcoinUniversity</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…swak</span>)</a></span> ‘s video yesterday made it clear that you shouldn’t fund your Braiins account directly from an exchange, but, instead, you should fund it from a separate wallet once removed from the exchange (e.g. exchange -&gt; sparrow-&gt; Braiins). I fail to see how this accomplishes anything.<br/><br/>What am I missing here? 2026-04-09T12:54:43Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsyt7y7ztvya4k2jel8lhksvj3p3uyzgj45n2tuwnc3g3dpwgpr3egzyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vkg8uc2s <span itemprop="mentions" itemscope itemtype="https://schema.org/Person"><a itemprop="url" href="/nprofile1qqsg2zqd8wkhpnxu6lm5c2dyfa2mhpwte57apjae2ldp6g2mmwf3ypqpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezummcw3ezuer9wchszxnhwden5te0wp6hyctkd9jxztnwdaehgu3wd3skuep08mhk3q" class="bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1"><span>preston</span> (<span class="italic">nprofile…hk3q</span>)</a></span> with the AnchorWatch legends…FIRE!<br/><br/><a href="https://fountain.fm/episode/nucsXUKBM3YjxLrMgzT1">https://fountain.fm/episode/nucsXUKBM3YjxLrMgzT1</a><br/><br/> <img src="https://blossom.primal.net/087838f43f184d33a5fda421e3fd54ef47c0f89be9a027a19aea9f14d0d77de5.png"> 2025-08-06T17:31:26Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsz6xws99w00qjlusd8fqd53gy7rlpxd2gre6nw62dteqy4xqnyauczyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vkzumwtl In reply to <a href='/nevent1qqs2785dcwhmjljx72fwkfaqy48x3c2ud56zas4958h8jthqmp29mksxf8qvn'>nevent1q…8qvn</a><br/>_________________________<br/><br/>#solomining 2024-10-29T01:14:50Z https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs2785dcwhmjljx72fwkfaqy48x3c2ud56zas4958h8jthqmp29mkszyp82dg94tepn8eypzmnkjwjzzzz0wuzv99fwfznhxkxs4hzrss0vk929hdf Solo mining newb questions:<br/><br/>I’m running bitcoin core on Umbrel and just installed the public pool app to learn about solo mining. I’ve got a bitaxe pointed to the stratum address of the local public pool instance. <br/><br/>The public pool app can see the bitaxe activity, and I can see the job information being sent to the bitaxe in the bitaxe logs. It’s hashing away (and occasionally overheating), and everything appears to be working fine. <br/><br/>I’m assuming the bitaxe firmware is getting the block template from the public pool Umbrel app. Is this accurate?<br/><br/>If so, is the local public pool app generating its own block template based on my local node, or is it getting it from the ‘larger’ public pool?<br/><br/>Is the local public pool app decreasing the difficulty that’s being sent to my bitaxe, like most pools do? I’m assuming it is since I can see that many shares have been submitted by the bitaxe. <br/><br/>Is any of this configurable locally?<br/><br/>Is any of this able to be viewed via the CLI?<br/><br/>Appreciate any feedback. 2024-10-29T01:01:28Z