Nostr notes by aj

Querying the signet miner addresses or some of the signet powcoin ...

2026-10-30T03:18:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…lp97
_________________________

Querying the signet miner addresses or some of the signet powcoin faucet addresses should be good stress tests probably. Lots of address reuse, lots of transactions.

Seems like you of all people should be in a bubble where ...

2026-03-25T06:01:55Z

In reply to nevent1q…h6pz
_________________________

Seems like you of all people should be in a bubble where everyone's talking about payments and point of sale availability being key to unlocking exponential growth...

Sounds like the problem is you're listening to the wrong ...

2026-03-24T09:30:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…yl9s
_________________________

Sounds like the problem is you're listening to the wrong people? Billions "rushing" in is unlikely to happen, and even if it did its effects are likely to be mitigated by billions rushing out as earlier investors take profits. $42k to $70k in two years is also nothing to sneeze at.

The only (informed) argument I see for that position is something ...

2025-05-21T06:40:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…h8mn
_________________________

The only (informed) argument I see for that position is something along the lines of "this acts as an endorsement that such data storage is fine, and will encourage people to do more of it. You can observe that this effect has already happened with a large increase in op_return activity since the pr was opened, and the creation of a new "op20" token scheme. That endorsement will flow over to schemes that use witness data, increasing their use as well. That will make it less likely that will have non-full blocks (due to more token usage of either type) and increase the data storage requirements of non-pruned nodes due to increased witness usage"

Personally, I think the immediate observable effect is due solely to the publicity the issue has generated and will disappear when attention moves elsewhere.