<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-07-06T04:12:34Z</updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.now</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by MindfulMaverick</title>
  <author>
    <name>MindfulMaverick</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.now/npub1agm867547svr98u3vhhksxy2jzfx650hhpcy93ctr6pdqcdnzsgq80g0zc.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.now/npub1agm867547svr98u3vhhksxy2jzfx650hhpcy93ctr6pdqcdnzsgq80g0zc" />
  <id>https://nostr.now/npub1agm867547svr98u3vhhksxy2jzfx650hhpcy93ctr6pdqcdnzsgq80g0zc</id>
  <icon></icon>
  <logo></logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs0gdd6q3x9e20xfwqzfl3fc6xz6z4ex062kwnd6s66zcwzddpv4eczyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pq3xz8vw</id>
    
      <title type="html">I’m trying to understand how PieFed’s voting culture is ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs0gdd6q3x9e20xfwqzfl3fc6xz6z4ex062kwnd6s66zcwzddpv4eczyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pq3xz8vw" />
    <content type="html">
      I’m trying to understand how PieFed’s voting culture is different. I’ll admit, I usually upvote things I like and downvote the rest. Sometimes, if a post has a low score, I don&amp;#39;t even read the title, I just downvote and move on. I suspect I’m not the only one who does this.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I know PieFed shows &amp;#34;Attitude&amp;#34; (the percentage of positive vs. negative votes you cast) on profiles, which is a nice touch. But aside from that metric, it doesn&amp;#39;t seem to physically limit the act of downvoting.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Are there plans to make voting more meaningful? For instance, I&amp;#39;ve seen suggestions in the community about restricting votes to subscribers to prevent &amp;#34;drive-by&amp;#34; downvotes from people who aren&amp;#39;t part of the community. How does PieFed plan to handle the issue of users reflexively downvoting without engaging with the content?
    </content>
    <updated>2026-03-05T11:33:56Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsw4mk2qylrf00nq2rwayrcjh4c9dvueumf7qlehfcjd94mt74w0aqzyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pqseun6c</id>
    
      <title type="html">I used to be a passionate gamer, and I often find myself ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsw4mk2qylrf00nq2rwayrcjh4c9dvueumf7qlehfcjd94mt74w0aqzyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pqseun6c" />
    <content type="html">
      I used to be a passionate gamer, and I often find myself nostalgic for the golden era of video games when there were new ideas popping left and right.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Now, it feels like we’re caught between long-delayed triple-A titles and a constant stream of indie platformers. Originality seems to have taken a backseat, with many games regurgitating the same concepts. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;What do you think defined the golden era of gaming? Are we currently in a rut, or is there a chance for fresh ideas to emerge again?
    </content>
    <updated>2026-02-22T17:29:57Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs967zks037dpcj85dszrncxr95xm79gld5uwfxmqtwrqpsz0cy4gszyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pq3htwnf</id>
    
      <title>Nostr event nevent1qqs967zks037dpcj85dszrncxr95xm79gld5uwfxmqtwrqpsz0cy4gszyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pq3htwnf</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs967zks037dpcj85dszrncxr95xm79gld5uwfxmqtwrqpsz0cy4gszyr4rvlt6jh6psv5lj9j776qc32gfym2377u8qsk8pv0g95rpkv2pq3htwnf" />
    <content type="html">
      I think that&amp;#39;s some important missing functionality.
    </content>
    <updated>2025-10-26T15:23:05Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>