Nostr notes by AKingsbury

"You can't have capitalism without employer-employee ...

2026-08-14T15:17:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…h6yh
_________________________

"You can't have capitalism without employer-employee contracts being enforced."

You've made it abundantly clear many times already that you do not grasp the concept of capitalism. You don't need to belabor the point. If you ever want to learn, I'll be here, but I think we both know you're more interested in spouting nonsense.

If you say anything worth responding to, I'll respond, but I'm not going to hold my breath.

A. No, it doesn't, because while capitalism ALLOWS ...

2026-08-14T08:44:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…g8mr
_________________________

A. No, it doesn't, because while capitalism ALLOWS employee/employer relationships, it does not REQUIRE them.

B. Even assuming it does require enforcing contracts, that is a contract being enforced, not capitalism being enforced.

Obviously capitalism isn't "natural". neither are ...

2026-08-13T23:17:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…6dgf
_________________________

Obviously capitalism isn't "natural". neither are eyeglasses; it's a vacuous point.

As to "enforced"; not really, no. Capitalism is respected or not, not "enforced". That would imply that, under #capitalism, no one can practice anything else, which would be an ignorant claim to make.

It's #socialism which requires enforcement. Quite brutal enforcement, as it turns out.

Admittedly, I assume you have not managed to consult any actual ...

2026-07-15T00:18:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…9msv
_________________________

Admittedly, I assume you have not managed to consult any actual references on the matter, but that is because I tend to default to the more charitable assumption. The other options are that you're arrogant enough to imagine your definitions are superior to those of studied professionals, or possibly that you're a liar.

Meh; you already cannot manage to read a dictionary. I'm ...

2026-07-14T08:50:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…hajp
_________________________

Meh; you already cannot manage to read a dictionary. I'm unsurprised at your other poor practices and bad conclusions.

Yes, or I could point you to an actual resource. Again, if ...

2026-07-14T02:43:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…elp4
_________________________

Yes, or I could point you to an actual resource. Again, if reading is objectionable to you, I can provide other resources. But directing you to a resource because you are wrong, which you are, is not an ad hominem. You can claim otherwise all you like, but I can only lead you to water; I cannot make you drink it.

If you ever decide to drink the water, I'll be here.

"You invited me to consult a dictionary, which has nothing to ...

2026-07-14T01:56:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…qwnx
_________________________

"You invited me to consult a dictionary, which has nothing to do with whether I am correctly defining capitalism or not."

Of course it does. If I asked you to define "dog" and you said "a dog is a type of reptile", it would be entirely appropriate for me to direct you to reference material, because you would be wrong. As you are wrong about what capitalism is, I direct you to reference material.

If you wish not to be directed to reference materials, stop saying incorrect things.

"Ad hominem will get you nowhere." I agree. Good thing I ...

2026-07-14T01:45:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…rq3a
_________________________

"Ad hominem will get you nowhere."

I agree. Good thing I never used it. I never attacked you personally, or your character, or your motivation. I attacked your argument, which is not ad hominem.

"Would you like me to define capital more clearly?"

No, I'd like you to consult a dictionary or an Econ 10 textbook. If you object to reading, I can also provide some good video resources.

Okay, so the problem here is that you're using a totally ...

2026-07-14T01:40:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…s3gx
_________________________

Okay, so the problem here is that you're using a totally contrived "definition". I invite you to consult a dictionary. Or an Econ 101 textbook.

Well, let's make sure we're clear on the premise. What do ...

2026-07-14T01:35:56Z

In reply to nevent1q…9ay3
_________________________

Well, let's make sure we're clear on the premise.

What do you think "capitalism" even is?

I'm pleased it apparently worked out this time, but in the ...

2026-07-14T00:19:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…kfyn
_________________________

I'm pleased it apparently worked out this time, but in the future, PLEASE consider proper canning jars. If you're concerned about single-use lids, there are other options; tattler lids for ball-style jars, weck jars with glass lids, etc. Canning is a great thing for many people, but botulism isn't worth saving a few pennies.

" how does capitalism respect basic human rights?" By ...

2026-07-13T10:56:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…l7t4
_________________________

" how does capitalism respect basic human rights?"

By refusing to violate them, which every other economic system does.

"How does capitalism raise people from poverty?"

By MANY mechanisms; really, it would be more accurate to say that capitalism best enables them to raise themselves out of poverty.

Of course. It's the only economic system that respects basic ...

2026-07-13T10:36:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…fv83
_________________________

Of course. It's the only economic system that respects basic human rights, and the one which by far outperforms any other in terms of improving the situation of everyone, including those worst off. It has raised countless people out of poverty, and led to some of the greatest advances in human history.

There are many, many useful things one could do. Far too many to ...

2026-07-13T10:29:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…4a0e
_________________________

There are many, many useful things one could do. Far too many to name here.

I sometimes wonder what could be accomplished if one one ...

2026-07-13T10:19:06Z

In reply to nevent1q…j3ng
_________________________

I sometimes wonder what could be accomplished if one one hundredth of the time and effort that's put into whining about capitalism by people who don't understand anything about economics was instead put towards anything useful.

"Benn Jordan has yet to miss." Except for the fact that ...

2026-07-11T01:40:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…fxqn
_________________________

"Benn Jordan has yet to miss."

Except for the fact that he has no clue what capitalism is. He's bought into this whole "endless growth" nonsense that's peddled by economically illiterate anti-capitalists. I like a lot of his stuff, he seems very reasonable on a lot of things, but he's just simply wrong on this.

Capitalism is not predicated on the idea of endless or perpetual growth. Never has been.

Yes, yes, again, I understand you are totally economically ...

2026-06-01T08:42:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…q7vj
_________________________

Yes, yes, again, I understand you are totally economically illiterate and lack the capacity for change.

Have a nice day.

Well, it depends who you listen to and how accurate you want to ...

2026-06-01T08:35:32Z

In reply to nevent1q…z28m
_________________________

Well, it depends who you listen to and how accurate you want to be. If you listen to anti-capitalists, sure; but the vast majority of them are economically illiterate, especially on this platform.

Anyone who claims the USA is entirely or mostly a free-market capitalist nation is, BEST case scenario, clueless.

You're shifting all over the place. "If you've never ...

2026-05-15T16:45:33Z

In reply to nevent1q…k4da
_________________________

You're shifting all over the place.

"If you've never found anyone who respects you"

"when every single anti-capitalist you meet is dishonest, and disrespectful"

At least with the second one, you managed to more accurately reflect my claims.

Of course you ignored it. I never said anything even remotely ...

2026-05-15T16:03:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…d3yv
_________________________

Of course you ignored it. I never said anything even remotely resembling "no one respects me"; that is something you can extract from my words only if you are being deeply dishonest and ignoring the meaning of my statements.

Plenty of people respect me. I notice you feel the need to ...

2026-05-15T15:56:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…9fz4
_________________________

Plenty of people respect me. I notice you feel the need to totally ignore significant parts of what I've said. Getting back to that whole "honesty" thing.

The problem with democracy (which, to be clear, is a system I ...

2026-05-15T14:24:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…fcme
_________________________

The problem with democracy (which, to be clear, is a system I support) is that it relies on the people to make the decisions. Which works out fine...IF the bulk of people are principled, honest, reasonably educated, etc. But precious few people right now fit that description. Just as one example, I have yet to encounter a single anti-capitalist on this platform that can manage to have an honest, mutually respectful discussion on the matter.

It's odd to me, though (and I'm not accusing you of this) ...

2026-05-15T14:01:14Z

In reply to nevent1q…x3t0
_________________________

It's odd to me, though (and I'm not accusing you of this) how many people understand this....and then propose #socialism as the solution. AKA, giving the government control of not only their food, but their power, their medical care, etc.

No, really, of all the thousands of data centers that have been ...

2026-05-03T03:10:02Z

In reply to nevent1q…sqpf
_________________________

No, really, of all the thousands of data centers that have been built, surely none of them have ever had to figure out how to deal with an invasive species. Over decades of environmentally-oriented action, surely all people had to do was come up with the right plant to stop people in their tracks. It's not as if humanity figured out how to raze hundreds of acres of wildlands at a time over a hundred years ago.

No, sure, "poison oak" is going to stop a developer.

Right. You really cannot conceive of any way this might work out ...

2026-05-03T02:57:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…c6ty
_________________________

Right. You really cannot conceive of any way this might work out poorly, can you? You think newly build, professionally made reinforced concrete slabs will have cracks in them. You're fine with huge amounts of powerful herbicides getting sprayed.

Well, best of luck. I'd ask you to let me know about any successes, but I doubt you'll ever have a single one with this plan.

Try to put yourself in their shoes. You've spent 8 or 9 ...

2026-05-03T02:39:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…8xvl
_________________________

Try to put yourself in their shoes. You've spent 8 or 9 figures building this place, and there are some invasive species causing problems.

Do you give up and walk away from an investment that's supposed to pay out for a decade?

Or do you, for example, spend 50 grand on the most powerful herbicides you can buy?

They're going to regrow up through a concrete slab?

2026-05-03T02:12:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…jjth
_________________________

They're going to regrow up through a concrete slab?

How resistant are any of these to bulldozers? Because I'm ...

2026-05-03T01:51:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…52ue
_________________________

How resistant are any of these to bulldozers? Because I'm pretty sure they just use bulldozers.

Okay, see, perfect example. Where are you getting that definition ...

2026-05-01T19:48:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…ruef
_________________________

Okay, see, perfect example. Where are you getting that definition from?

I've never seen anyone who shares that quote demonstrate an ...

2026-05-01T17:45:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…4spj
_________________________

I've never seen anyone who shares that quote demonstrate an actual understanding of even basic economics. None of them seem to understand what capitalism even is, much less have an actual articulable objection to it.

I often hear people complaining about "unregulated ...

2026-03-21T16:35:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…cfuj
_________________________

I often hear people complaining about "unregulated capitalism". And yet, when asked for examples, they almost always point to things like healthcare, or finance; AKA, some of the most heavily regulated sectors of the economy.

But it doesn't "automatically go everywhere", does ...

2026-02-15T10:05:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…3ppk
_________________________

But it doesn't "automatically go everywhere", does it? Someone needs to tell the system which creators you support. And why should someone whose song you listened to once get the same support as someone whose songs you listen to daily?

I doubt it can get much easier.

2026-02-15T00:57:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…8hzy
_________________________

I doubt it can get much easier.

People already can (and, sometimes, do) just put their work on ...

2026-02-14T22:34:58Z

In reply to nevent1q…r33j
_________________________

People already can (and, sometimes, do) just put their work on their own websites and have people pay them directly. I've bought such media myself. As it turns out, though...platforms provide useful services to creators. That is why many creators choose to go to them. No one is forcing them to; they are doing it voluntarily. Do you think they're all just too stupid to just know that your way is better? Do they not know they can sell their work direct to consumers? Something else?

"just unnecessary." That's it? So anything that's ...

2026-02-14T21:10:31Z

In reply to nevent1q…rt5v
_________________________

"just unnecessary."

That's it? So anything that's "unnecessary" has to go?

"Patreon is the closest to what I'm advocating but ...

2026-02-14T19:29:34Z

In reply to nevent1q…4vnc
_________________________

"Patreon is the closest to what I'm advocating but they've gotta go too."

Why?

That doesn't really seem in accord with your plan; patreon ...

2026-02-14T17:31:08Z

In reply to nevent1q…vzx2
_________________________

That doesn't really seem in accord with your plan; patreon seems rather a "corporate middleman", which you want there to be none of. Right?

I'm not sure what nuances I'm missing. You want some sort ...

2026-02-14T17:24:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…67f0
_________________________

I'm not sure what nuances I'm missing. You want some sort of a deal where you send out money on a monthly basis to various creators, with no "corporate middlemen". Which sort of begs the question of who is going to handle all the accounting, tracking who you want you money to go to, how much, etc. Most people are going to want a middleman, instead of juggling dozens or hundreds of payments a month, that will frequently change.

For the purposes of this discussion, I am entirely indifferent to ...

2026-02-14T17:18:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…5hn5
_________________________

For the purposes of this discussion, I am entirely indifferent to the politics of who owns which media outlets. People are going to seek out the media which suits them. Extremists will seek and find extremist media, moderates will find moderate media, authoritarians will find authoritarian media, and libertarians will find libertarian media.

We already have plenty of opportunities to fund creators ...

2026-02-14T17:13:06Z

In reply to nevent1q…grud
_________________________

We already have plenty of opportunities to fund creators directly. Lots of podcasts, for example, have subscriptions, but I doubt one person in ten thousand pays as much for all the media they consume as they would have to if there were no advertising.

And, in a very real way, advertising benefits some of us. It's basically a transfer payment from those who buy the things advertised to those who do not. The less you buy, the more it benefits you.

I mean...money for things like newspapers and podcasts and ...

2026-02-14T17:02:17Z

In reply to nevent1q…9a8a
_________________________

I mean...money for things like newspapers and podcasts and whatnot has to come from somewhere if they're going to exist. May people are reluctant to pay enough to get the service entirely without ads; even those of us who do subscribe to some things rarely pay the full fair price for all the media we consume. How are you planning on getting most people to pay a lot more?

"Mostly by making it so that wealth can't be used to buy ...

2026-02-14T16:46:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…6lfs
_________________________

"Mostly by making it so that wealth can't be used to buy attention."

I'm not sure how that would even work. So you could never buy an advertisement? Never pay for a spot in the newspaper? Never use your wealth to produce a book or move or song?

I agree that SOME SECTORS of what we have now are not in accord ...

2026-02-07T22:57:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…sqdq
_________________________

I agree that SOME SECTORS of what we have now are not in accord with a free market. Others are. And even those sectors which are not in accord with free markets are not automatically "oligarchy".

As to "giving them over to the state and thus removing the profit motive", that SOUNDS nice, but it's nonsense. People don't stop being greedy or power-seeking when they enter public service. You really think that, say, congresspeople never abuse their power to enrich themselves?

Again, someone who blames capitalism for what they dislike but is ...

2026-02-07T21:59:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…quq9
_________________________

Again, someone who blames capitalism for what they dislike but is apparently confused about what it even is.

The government paying these companies is clearly NOT in accord with the free markets that capitalism directs. The reason that amazon made those $75M is not because any of us chose to give it to them, voluntarily; it is because the government TOOK it from us, through threat of violence. That is not a free market.

That's a very narrow way to define "efficient". It ...

2026-01-28T00:35:19Z

In reply to nevent1q…nvar
_________________________

That's a very narrow way to define "efficient". It ignores things like "energy consumption".

To be 100% clear; both main parties have been terrible on ...

2026-01-17T23:34:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…dpf6
_________________________

To be 100% clear; both main parties have been terrible on immigration for decades, if not longer. If you support the democratic party or the republican party when it comes to immigration, you support the forcible removal of millions of peaceful, productive people from this nation.

It's a good thing that #immigration and #ICE are receiving a ...

2026-01-17T23:30:25Z

It's a good thing that #immigration and #ICE are receiving a lot of attention; the immigration system in the USA is poorly structured, and it should be overhauled completely.

Remember; both #democrat and #republican congresses and presidents have upheld this system; there's a reason then-president Obama was called "deporter in chief", with over 3 MILLION people deported over his tenure.

Is there a group that has long held that the system needs to be overhauled? Yes. The #libertarians.

I brought it up specifically as an example of a trivial monopoly; ...

2025-12-05T22:07:57Z

In reply to nevent1q…t5sr
_________________________

I brought it up specifically as an example of a trivial monopoly; I wouldn't expect to see much conversation about it.

I also support non-formal education; and, indeed, formal education. Getting rid of government-run schools would not be the end of formal education in any way.

I think what counts as "meaningful" is a conversation. I ...

2025-12-05T20:20:29Z

In reply to nevent1q…4tq7
_________________________

I think what counts as "meaningful" is a conversation. I have yet to meet anyone willing to seriously claim that, for example, a monopoly in baseball trading cards is a serious issue for society. I pay attention to plenty of economists, and yes, I do have some formal education in it. Not a degree, but some education. No, I do not think state-run universities should exist.

None that I'm aware of, but I am not an economic historian. ...

2025-12-05T20:10:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…8rwu
_________________________

None that I'm aware of, but I am not an economic historian. My confidence that no such thing exists in the developed world now comes from A. several economists making that claim and B. the absence of a single counterexample despite years of looking for one.

"No examples" of what?

2025-12-05T19:59:07Z

In reply to nevent1q…q5vm
_________________________

"No examples" of what?

Oh, I'm sure there have been meaningful monopolies in the ...

2025-12-05T19:50:36Z

In reply to nevent1q…2an5
_________________________

Oh, I'm sure there have been meaningful monopolies in the past without government assistance. There may even be a few now, in countries with more poorly developed economies. But I've looked and asked for years for an example of one NOW, and people have so far been unable to point to even a single one. And no, I don't "control the definition"; I didn't make up what monopoly means, or what a free market is. These are well-understood and developed economic concepts.

I'm not asking for perfect monopolies; I'm asking for ...

2025-12-05T18:13:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…4598
_________________________

I'm not asking for perfect monopolies; I'm asking for something that is even meaningfully a monopoly. We do have plenty of meaningfully free markets, and many have existed throughout history.

I'm perfectly willing to accept how the real world works. I am also willing to talk about how it could work better. For example, I'm an advocate for abolishing certificate of need laws.

I agree; there are many ways to make things worse without being a ...

2025-12-05T17:57:52Z

In reply to nevent1q…403a
_________________________

I agree; there are many ways to make things worse without being a monopoly. But I also believe that it's worthwhile to be accurate; if we want to make good policy to avoid monopolies, that begins by being accurate about what a monopoly even is. It's not enough for a business to simply be big. As to gains for one beings losses to another, that is extremely uncommon in a free market, and when it does occur it's almost always due to fraud.

That would be far closer, because the price of installing solar ...

2025-12-05T17:29:24Z

In reply to nevent1q…muz7
_________________________

That would be far closer, because the price of installing solar on one's home is prohibitive for many, many cannot do so at any practical price , many are legally barred from doing so, etc. But Amazon? There's nothing they come even close to having a monopoly in, except arguably some of their media. And I shed exactly zero tears for someone who's problem is "I want to watch a show made by amazon".

Well, they are not a monopoly, and they get a huge amount of ...

2025-12-05T16:47:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…w2c8
_________________________

Well, they are not a monopoly, and they get a huge amount of government assistance. So they do not fit my criteria. Never changed any of those criteria. But again, please, tell me what they have a monopoly in; something only they sell that I cannot get the same thing or a perfectly adequate substitute elsewhere easily. Anything.

The internet? As an example of what?

2025-12-05T16:36:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…uem2
_________________________

The internet? As an example of what?

Sure, Amazon is dominant. But in what do they have a monopoly? ...

2025-12-05T16:35:34Z

In reply to nevent1q…jmdw
_________________________

Sure, Amazon is dominant. But in what do they have a monopoly? What can I buy ONLY from them that I cannot get the same thing or a perfectly adequate substitute easily from elsewhere (e.g., sure, they have a monopoly in their branded goods, but other perfectly suitable substitutes are available)?

As to the amount they get from the government, they get BILLIONS a year, but also a lot of other government assistance.

Two things. One, they're not a monopoly, and two, they get a ...

2025-12-05T16:19:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…2kvj
_________________________

Two things. One, they're not a monopoly, and two, they get a HUGE amount of government money and other assistance. So they're really the opposite of the government-independent monopoly I've asked people to point to.

Well, over 20% of homes in the US use septic; so that's a ...

2025-12-05T16:10:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…myez
_________________________

Well, over 20% of homes in the US use septic; so that's a hefty chunk that are not getting sewer from the government right there.

As to the market working well, competition is part of that. For years, I have challenged people to point out any significant monopoly that does not rely on government protection or assistance to survive. Not a single person has been able to do so.

Well, a few things. One, no, sewer is not "much more fully ...

2025-12-05T15:48:25Z

In reply to nevent1q…ef2n
_________________________

Well, a few things. One, no, sewer is not "much more fully controlled" by the government than healthcare, nor is water; there is VASTLY more regulation around banking, healthcare, etc., than there is around serer systems. But also, where they are controlled, they mostly are controlled by much lower (and therefore more accountable) levels of government. Finally, they are much less ripe for abuse.

I have yet to see anyone point to a major problem in the market ...

2025-12-05T15:32:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…ctvc
_________________________

I have yet to see anyone point to a major problem in the market that does not have a significant government component. Which sectors do people complain about most? Healthcare, housing, banking...oddly, some of the most highly regulated sectors out there.

Food can be 3d printed. It's trivial at this point. ...

2025-11-29T11:45:49Z

In reply to nevent1q…pj9p
_________________________

Food can be 3d printed. It's trivial at this point. https://www.3dsourced.com/rankings/food-3d-printer/

There is a difference between creating a material and fabricating it. I might just as well say that a lathe doesn't make metal. True, but...did anyone say it did? Is anyone claiming that 3d printing is a substitute for agriculture?

You apparently think of it immediately when you see stories about ...

2025-11-21T15:20:15Z

In reply to nevent1q…ea79
_________________________

You apparently think of it immediately when you see stories about people getting fired.

You know, I never see anyone saying "Such-and-such many ...

2025-11-21T00:28:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…9kpl
_________________________

You know, I never see anyone saying "Such-and-such many people got hired; capitalism at work!!!". It's almost as if emotionally motivated, biased commentary is popular.

"I'm excluded from #crowdfund platforms like ...

2025-11-04T08:46:11Z

In reply to nevent1q…sktg
_________________________

"I'm excluded from #crowdfund platforms like #kickstarter"

Why?

I want an example of them ACTIVELY HARMING you, not of them ...

2025-11-03T01:30:13Z

In reply to nevent1q…nsrg
_________________________

I want an example of them ACTIVELY HARMING you, not of them exerting perfectly reasonable control over their own property. I might as well whine that you won't let me store my stuff in your home for free without asking. If I thought you were infringing on my IP, I'd respond too.

"Probably maybe"? No, you definitely could, unless it's filled with smut or classified information or something.

Okay, so no examples. Got it. You have no examples, not even one, ...

2025-11-03T00:36:45Z

In reply to nevent1q…h6x3
_________________________

Okay, so no examples. Got it. You have no examples, not even one, not even that you would present from behind a veil of anonymity. Not really surprising.

You're really doing yourself a solid by whining instead of ...

2025-11-03T00:08:51Z

In reply to nevent1q…ejrd
_________________________

You're really doing yourself a solid by whining instead of taking any of the dozens of opportunities available to you.

What has any publisher, anywhere, ever done to actively harm you? Just one thing. Because a beating is active harm.

Sure, "everywhere else" besides literally dozens of ...

2025-11-03T00:04:16Z

In reply to nevent1q…s23e
_________________________

Sure, "everywhere else" besides literally dozens of channels. Lots of industries are over-regulated and/or captured. But publishing? Please. Stop playing the victim. For heaven's sake, zine culture is over a century old. And those folks didn't have easy access to cheap, high-quality printers they could keep and use in their own homes. You can literally advertise via dozens of venues, you could quite feasibly print the book YOURSELF.

You could literally tell me about it right here, right now, and ...

2025-11-02T23:49:56Z

In reply to nevent1q…0qep
_________________________

You could literally tell me about it right here, right now, and no publishing company on earth can stop you or punish you (unless you already have some kind of contract with them with clauses about permitted advertising). You could tell anyone on here who hasn't blocked you. You could get on reddit and tell people there. Or facebook. Or tiktok. Or bluesky. PLENTY of options out there to promote your work in ways publishers cannot prevent.

You could....and this is just brainstorming, here....you could ...

2025-11-02T22:38:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…c74x
_________________________

You could....and this is just brainstorming, here....you could tell people about it.

You do know you can publish your stories for all of about fifty ...

2025-11-02T20:18:28Z

In reply to nevent1q…h2wp
_________________________

You do know you can publish your stories for all of about fifty bucks on your own website, right? And that there are plenty of websites where they will post them for free?

Meh. For years, when I saw people making these sorts of claims, ...

2025-10-24T11:53:41Z

In reply to nevent1q…y2am
_________________________

Meh. For years, when I saw people making these sorts of claims, I'd read the article. Every single time, without any exception whatsoever, their analysis was so deeply flawed as to be laughable.

At some point, it became clear that such claims are fallacious, and that those making them are, at best, fools.

Eh. You can re-learn all those skills, if you want. Many people ...

2025-10-18T13:36:04Z

In reply to nevent1q…sayf
_________________________

Eh. You can re-learn all those skills, if you want. Many people do. But most people have decided that their time is better spent in other ways.

I adhere to the server character limit, so just to take your ...

2025-09-28T00:01:37Z

In reply to nevent1q…qau4
_________________________

I adhere to the server character limit, so just to take your second point; functionally mandatory union memberships are ABSOLUTELY still a thing in many places in the US; namely, everywhere that isn't a "right to work" state. You might say "Oh, you're only required to pay dues, you don't HAVE to be a member!" So, you're required by law to take the bad part of the deal and not the "good" part of the deal? Hmmm.

The odd thing about unions is that they're supposedly such a ...

2025-09-27T16:49:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…0wa9
_________________________

The odd thing about unions is that they're supposedly such a great idea, and yet many of them happily use force of law to make people either join them, or deny them their right to work in the field.

Which means either A. unions aren't actually that good for their members or B. their members are too stupid to understand that they're a good deal, and have to be coerced at gunpoint.

VOLUNTARY #unions? Go for it, all day long. FORCED unions? Pure authoritarianism.

Is it disturbing to you that someone would offer such work ...

2025-09-06T19:06:26Z

In reply to nevent1q…w27y
_________________________

Is it disturbing to you that someone would offer such work arrangements, or that people would take them? Or both?

"The 996 work model is modern slavery, nothing less." Any ...

2025-09-06T18:40:46Z

In reply to nevent1q…4l34
_________________________

"The 996 work model is modern slavery, nothing less."

Any time someone compares something to #slavery, the first question that comes to my mind is "Can the people in question quit?"

Oh, they can? And they won't be imprisoned or beaten? No one else owns them, and they do indeed own themselves? Then it's #notslavery.

"As long as capitalism governs through war & crisis, true ...

2025-09-04T10:53:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…ltdz
_________________________

"As long as capitalism governs through war & crisis, true socialism cannot emerge."'

Great news! Capitalism does not govern us. It is an economic system, not a political one. Does it exert influence? Of course, just as any economic system must in order to be relevant to anything but mere discussion.

Yes, I am talking about you. That's an entirely inaccurate ...

2025-08-31T18:33:35Z

In reply to nevent1q…plhg
_________________________

Yes, I am talking about you. That's an entirely inaccurate characterization of capitalism. "We do the work, they get the money."?

Uh, no. For one thing, workers are paid or otherwise compensated (e.g., with health benefits, 401(k) matching, etc), so it's dishonest to say "Oh, THEY get the money!"

"#Capitalism: We do the work, they get the money. How fair is ...

2025-08-31T18:27:05Z

In reply to nevent1q…e4nz
_________________________

"#Capitalism: We do the work, they get the money. How fair is that?"

Well, it's never really "fair" when people completely misrepresent an idea just because they hate it, but that's life.

Actually, again, I can and will comment as I please.

2025-08-29T12:54:40Z

In reply to nevent1q…dm2t
_________________________

Actually, again, I can and will comment as I please.

Actually, I can comment. And I've heard plenty of people try ...

2025-08-29T11:54:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…grrq
_________________________

Actually, I can comment. And I've heard plenty of people try to come up with reasons they are "slaves" because they (gasp!) have a job; it has been nonsense, each and every time, with no exceptions.

Again, your life is nowhere near that bad. Not even close. Get over yourself.

"My favourite quote: "Capitalism is wage slavery" ...

2025-08-29T00:14:10Z

In reply to nevent1q…vzl7
_________________________

"My favourite quote: "Capitalism is wage slavery"
Yes, I'm a slave"

Please.

This man was a slave:

You are not.

Get over yourself.

Yes, about the level of commentary I've come to expect from ...

2025-07-14T08:32:30Z

In reply to nevent1q…3nps
_________________________

Yes, about the level of commentary I've come to expect from you. I wish it was a disappointment, but nothing you've said ever led me to expect you to say anything worthwhile.

Well, toss out some more cheap, baseless insults, if you like; I certainly don't expect anything honest, insightful, or otherwise worth reading. You seem the sort who needs the last word to make yourself feel good, so it's all yours.

Hey, assume based on whatever makes you feel good; I never ...

2025-07-14T01:27:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…djnf
_________________________

Hey, assume based on whatever makes you feel good; I never imagined you had any real honesty about facts or reality.

Well, have a nice life, thief; the world is a poorer, worse place because of you.

Oh, I never imagined you could do better than assume you were ...

2025-07-14T01:24:23Z

In reply to nevent1q…zyl8
_________________________

Oh, I never imagined you could do better than assume you were right, based on nothing.

I don't care about them any more of less. than I care about ...

2025-07-14T01:18:00Z

In reply to nevent1q…n0ec
_________________________

I don't care about them any more of less. than I care about you. What I care about are principles.

You're a common, cheap thief. Plain and simple. And you steal, not because you have need, but because you have desire. You don't steal bread to feed your hungry family, you steal games to feed your cheap, base desires.

Pathetic. I feel bad for you. You don't even have a real struggle to feel good about.

Ah, yes. Crude sexual accusations; sure evidence of a strong, ...

2025-07-13T23:47:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…cf53
_________________________

Ah, yes. Crude sexual accusations; sure evidence of a strong, principled position.

Yes, you're a "victim" now. Please.

2025-07-13T23:15:43Z

In reply to nevent1q…mc68
_________________________

Yes, you're a "victim" now.

Please.

Meh. More of what I expected, never what I hoped for.

2025-07-13T23:09:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…tth0
_________________________

Meh. More of what I expected, never what I hoped for.

By all means. If you ever develop a desire to grasp trivially ...

2025-07-13T23:05:22Z

In reply to nevent1q…6w0u
_________________________

By all means. If you ever develop a desire to grasp trivially basic economic concepts, I'm here.

Not at all. I don't feel "superior" to anyone because ...

2025-07-13T23:03:01Z

In reply to nevent1q…h3le
_________________________

Not at all. I don't feel "superior" to anyone because I understand that 2 and 2 makes 4. I want everyone to grasp basic ideas.

Oh, no! Where will I get my nonsense from?

2025-07-13T22:59:19Z

In reply to nevent1q…enmq
_________________________

Oh, no! Where will I get my nonsense from?

If I "ignored" everyone who had hairbrained ideas they ...

2025-07-13T22:57:21Z

In reply to nevent1q…xy5j
_________________________

If I "ignored" everyone who had hairbrained ideas they refused to actually test or who made baseless accusations or who had no real value to contribute to any meaningful conversation...well, actually, things would probably improve.

Definitely a plan to consider.

Meh. Make whatever baseless accusations and excuses you like. I ...

2025-07-13T22:53:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…65qs
_________________________

Meh. Make whatever baseless accusations and excuses you like. I never expected better.

I never said that moving to Venezuela was THE solution. I'm ...

2025-07-13T22:42:38Z

In reply to nevent1q…vlfn
_________________________

I never said that moving to Venezuela was THE solution. I'm pointing out that there are MANY possible ways of proving that socialism, communsim, etc. are just..just SO much better, and yet somehow, there's a pile of whining and precious few attempts at actually proving the point.

Let me know if you ever decide to have the conversation without changing what you've said along the way.

Nothing much. Just seems like there is a huge amount of whining ...

2025-07-13T22:35:42Z

In reply to nevent1q…efe9
_________________________

Nothing much. Just seems like there is a huge amount of whining and complaining, and precious little action on, you know....proving that something, anything else is better by actual experiment.

Meh. More lies, but at least they're low quality and low ...

2025-07-13T21:56:44Z

In reply to nevent1q…s2vn
_________________________

Meh. More lies, but at least they're low quality and low effort.