<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-10-29T23:38:03Z</updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.now</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by littmath</title>
  <author>
    <name>littmath</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.now/npub13hcl2yln0w05ngjtr9gv2m5c0dh68ugc463uung0g8h2fldn7ydqg2qw66.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.now/npub13hcl2yln0w05ngjtr9gv2m5c0dh68ugc463uung0g8h2fldn7ydqg2qw66" />
  <id>https://nostr.now/npub13hcl2yln0w05ngjtr9gv2m5c0dh68ugc463uung0g8h2fldn7ydqg2qw66</id>
  <icon>https://media.mathstodon.xyz/accounts/avatars/000/287/789/original/7dfaba27a80b34a0.png</icon>
  <logo>https://media.mathstodon.xyz/accounts/avatars/000/287/789/original/7dfaba27a80b34a0.png</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsxdc65yc8ru9t6ngcfrvncrjetmuc8sxjufvyw53086av6kmrygnszyzxlragn7dae7jdzfvv4p3twnpaklgl3rzh28njdpaq7af8ak0c35c9vg3p</id>
    
      <title type="html">It&amp;#39;s the same counterexample!</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsxdc65yc8ru9t6ngcfrvncrjetmuc8sxjufvyw53086av6kmrygnszyzxlragn7dae7jdzfvv4p3twnpaklgl3rzh28njdpaq7af8ak0c35c9vg3p" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqs8uhez2nk5wuqp6478ydtnawdsrul40pel6daqa547tv65d8gwcrsr9z8n6&#39;&gt;nevent1q…z8n6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&amp;#39;s the same counterexample!
    </content>
    <updated>2026-07-21T15:16:07Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsx5ghhrgesjr6ar9v0ft0mfzuphgqka8urglrtxw6y55wau9hewzqzyzxlragn7dae7jdzfvv4p3twnpaklgl3rzh28njdpaq7af8ak0c35kzyz05</id>
    
      <title type="html">Reposting this from the other site at @npub1s4h…qs84&amp;#39;s ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsx5ghhrgesjr6ar9v0ft0mfzuphgqka8urglrtxw6y55wau9hewzqzyzxlragn7dae7jdzfvv4p3twnpaklgl3rzh28njdpaq7af8ak0c35kzyz05" />
    <content type="html">
      Reposting this from the other site at &lt;span itemprop=&#34;mentions&#34; itemscope itemtype=&#34;https://schema.org/Person&#34;&gt;&lt;a itemprop=&#34;url&#34; href=&#34;/npub1s4hqf67dr73p05v6nmff3c0yws920attdwjzyqjglyvcprzyu5rsp2qs84&#34; class=&#34;bg-lavender dark:prose:text-neutral-50 dark:text-neutral-50 dark:bg-garnet px-1&#34;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Colin the Mathmo&lt;/span&gt; (&lt;span class=&#34;italic&#34;&gt;npub1s4h…qs84&lt;/span&gt;)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;#39;s request: &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&amp;#39;ve recently been talking a bit about how difficult it is to carefully check even well-written mathematics. I want to try to explain something about this by telling the story of some errors in the literature that (in part) led to the two papers below. 1/n&lt;br/&gt; &lt;img src=&#34;https://media.mathstodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/113/755/424/602/923/883/original/1da40c76909047cb.png&#34;&gt; &lt;br/&gt; &lt;img src=&#34;https://media.mathstodon.xyz/media_attachments/files/113/755/425/338/076/510/original/919be08519057dd8.png&#34;&gt; &lt;br/&gt;
    </content>
    <updated>2025-01-01T22:20:55Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>