<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <updated>2026-10-25T09:47:16Z</updated>
  <generator>https://nostr.now</generator>

  <title>Nostr notes by David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)</title>
  <author>
    <name>David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)</name>
  </author>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://nostr.now/npub13gcwraghdcw9xzkg3tky24feu0lzkhtlt57wpdn58y4m4tyr9qdsxdk50d.rss" />
  <link href="https://nostr.now/npub13gcwraghdcw9xzkg3tky24feu0lzkhtlt57wpdn58y4m4tyr9qdsxdk50d" />
  <id>https://nostr.now/npub13gcwraghdcw9xzkg3tky24feu0lzkhtlt57wpdn58y4m4tyr9qdsxdk50d</id>
  <icon>https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/111/867/038/214/333/074/original/948015da7238758d.jpg</icon>
  <logo>https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/accounts/avatars/111/867/038/214/333/074/original/948015da7238758d.jpg</logo>




  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs8qfvpgzam9jvz9cp63x24we08yxflyrwshturnlracnr4d26z23gzyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pkycmljx</id>
    
      <title type="html">I&amp;#39;m curious how that data was collected. Is that 48% of EU ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs8qfvpgzam9jvz9cp63x24we08yxflyrwshturnlracnr4d26z23gzyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pkycmljx" />
    <content type="html">
      In reply to &lt;a href=&#39;/nevent1qqsxuln0p260p3tqs6fy9g75g2gwv2pr630gdc4a9d99ng4nry0c2sglfegxf&#39;&gt;nevent1q…egxf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;_________________________&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&amp;#39;m curious how that data was collected.  Is that 48% of EU employees self reported that they could spot AI fakes, or that 48% were able to in a double-blind test?  Or 48% were able to when they were in a high-stress situation where they had to make a quick decision?  I suspect the answers are very different.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Similarly, 54% of employees check the sender, but what does that mean?  Do they check the From: address?  Do headers to make sure that the from address matched a plausible arrival path (Outlook makes this almost impossible)?  Do they sit behind a policy that validates DKIM signatures and prevents messages with forged origin arriving?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;When I was at Microsoft, I tried sending my work account an email from my personal mail server claiming to be from another microsoft.com address.  It made it through all of the checks and wasn&amp;#39;t flagged as external.  I believe they&amp;#39;ve tightened things up since then.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-10-07T12:26:00Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs0t39cu0p2js2qjtax7744rwyhv89vxjacgc2td7pc3pwz4g7u7fszyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pkhlz3kr</id>
    
      <title type="html">Butterfly is much less fun to say than papillon so I am using the ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqs0t39cu0p2js2qjtax7744rwyhv89vxjacgc2td7pc3pwz4g7u7fszyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pkhlz3kr" />
    <content type="html">
      Butterfly is much less fun to say than papillon so I am using the standard process in the English language: deprecating a common-usage word and replacing it with a foreign word that I like better. From now on, all uses of the word ‘butterfly’ shall be deemed archaic. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thank you for your patience during the transition.
    </content>
    <updated>2026-09-24T08:28:27Z</updated>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqvph0lh002kgxarx6npujeda60y2szvqw9ru7upud4t6dz4aje0gzyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pk7c4pct</id>
    
      <title type="html">Kitten News: I discovered why the friendly kitten were so intent ...</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://nostr.now/nevent1qqsqvph0lh002kgxarx6npujeda60y2szvqw9ru7upud4t6dz4aje0gzyz9rpc04zahpc5c2ez9wc324883lu26a0awnec9kwsujhw4vsv5pk7c4pct" />
    <content type="html">
      Kitten News:&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I discovered why the friendly kitten were so intent on coming into our bedroom. We were quite grumpy yesterday because it decided to come in at a bit before 1am. We had the balcony door open because the heatwave made it very warm and, unfortunately, we learned that they could climb in through the window after we closed the door. And then he and his brother sat on the balcony plaintively mewing for a while.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It turns out their humans had gone away for a week. Someone had come in to feed them, but they’re only a few months old and had been surrounded by humans for most of this time. They were starting to get a bit starved for attention.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Last night, we went out at about 9pm and friendly kitten immediately appeared and spent most of the next two hours sitting on my lap and purring (pictured). But most importantly, scaredy kitten (his brother), who normally runs away after he notices me looking at him, came over and sat on my partner’s lap. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Scaredy kitten has the *loudest* purr. It’s quite audible from about 5m away. When he’s sitting on you purring, it’s the most relaxing thing.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This morning, we had coffee on the balcony and they came back. It’s quite difficult to drink coffee with one hand and stroke a kitten with the other, but I managed. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Total time spent stroking kittens so far this weekend: 3 hours.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;EDIT: since  posting this, they have been popping over regularly. Immediately after, both climbed on me and competed to see which could purr more loudly. Now friendly kitten is napping on my lap.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;img src=&#34;https://media.infosec.exchange/infosec.exchange/media_attachments/files/117/104/335/368/945/347/original/2008960a64d2e987.png&#34;&gt; &lt;br/&gt;
    </content>
    <updated>2026-08-16T09:01:17Z</updated>
  </entry>

</feed>